Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33453060›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2021

Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity- and contraction intensity-dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties.

Matheus D Pinto, Cody J Wilson, Anthony D Kay, Anthony J Blazevich

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matheus D PintoCentre for Exercise and Sports Science Research (CESSR), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-2492
Cody J WilsonCentre for Exercise and Sports Science Research (CESSR), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6310-8471
Anthony D KayCentre for Physical Activity and Life Sciences, The University of Northampton, Northampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0347-1046
Anthony J BlazevichCentre for Exercise and Sports Science Research (CESSR), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1664-1614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Flexibility" tests are traditionally performed voluntarily relaxed by rotating a joint slowly; however, functional activities are performed rapidly with voluntary/reflexive muscle activity. Here, we describe the reliabilities and differences in maximum ankle range of motion (ROM

Indexed as

Range of Motion, ArticularAdultAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyExercise TestFootHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle Strength DynamometerMuscle Stretching ExercisesReproducibility of Resultsflexibilitymuscle stretchingpassive and active stretchingrange of motionstiffness

Identifiers

PMID33453060
PMCPMC8251531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.