Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33453042›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2021

Drug Advertising Violations: A Longitudinal Trend Analysis of FDA Enforcement Letters from 2005 to 2019.

Katherine A P Zagrodney, Natasha Y Sheikhan, Ashlyn Pinto, Tania Sheikhan, Theodore J Witek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine A P ZagrodneyInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Natasha Y SheikhanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.
Ashlyn PintoMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Tania SheikhanUniversity College London, Gower Street, London, WCIE 6BT, UK.
Theodore J WitekInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. ted.witek@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1399-2702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the United States, all pharmaceutical promotional activities must comply with regulatory standards set by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); failure to comply may lead to receiving an FDA enforcement letter. Letters include details of the specific advertisement in violation, as well as the action that is required by the company to rectify the non-compliant promotion.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to determine trends in enforcement letters from the FDA to parties responsible for pharmaceutical promotion violations from 2005 to 2019.

methodsA longitudinal trend analysis was conducted of FDA enforcement letters sent to pharmaceutical companies from 2005 to 2019 (n = 318). Publicly available enforcement letters released by the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion were accessed and analysed online through the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, a part of the FDA. Variables analysed included number of letters by year, violation categories, venues, intended audience, drug age and company revenues. Publicly available revenue was the major source for company revenue information.

resultsThe total number of enforcement letters significantly decreased over time. Violations concerning risk information were significantly more prevalent than all other violation categories. Online promotional materials were most frequently cited. Proportionally, larger companies received the majority of letters in earlier years of observation, and smaller companies in later years (2013-2019).

conclusionsThese trends are of value for industry and regulators alike in refining policy to ensure fair, balanced and meaningful information in pharmaceutical promotion. The frequency of violation letters has decreased in recent years; however, smaller companies have increasingly received the majority of letters. Small firms must increase their compliance around informing drug risk potential with balanced safety information across all promotional venues. Specifically, these findings are useful for pharmaceutical companies to direct educational efforts to promotional staff and their advertising agencies, especially regarding online advertising.

Indexed as

AdvertisingPrescription DrugsDrug IndustryHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.