ReviewActa neurologica Belgica2021
Dopa-responsive dystonia, DRD-plus and DRD look-alike: a pragmatic review.
Review in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) and DRD plus are diseases of the dopamine pathway with sizeable genetic diversity and myriad presentations. DRD has onset in childhood or adolescence with focal dystonia, commonly affecting lower limb, diurnal fluctuations with evening worsening of symptoms and a demonstrable sleep benefit. DRD "plus" has "atypical features" which include infantile onset, psychomotor delay, cognitive abnormalities, oculogyric crisis, seizures, irritability, spasticity, hypotonia, ptosis, hyperthermia and cerebellar dysfunction. Neurodegeneration, however, is not a feature of either DRD or DRD-plus disorders. Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a key cofactor, deficiency leads to inadequate dopamine and serotonin synthesis. Norepinephrine deficiency may coexist, depending on the enzyme defect. Hyperphenylalaninemia (HPA) is a clue for BH4 paucity. However, HPA is conspicuously absent in autosomal-dominant guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase 1 deficiency and sepiapterin reductase deficiency. DRD look-alike is a group of neurodegenerative disorders involving the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system, which could present with dystonia responsive to dopaminergic drugs or neurodegenerative or non-neurodegenerative disorders without involving the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system yet responsive to levodopa. Although levodopa is the mainstay of therapy, response to this drug can be unsatisfactory in DRD plus and DRD look-alike and other drugs are tried. Simultaneous management of HPA leads to remarkable improvement in both motor and cognitive functions. The aim of this review is to help neurology practitioners in treating patients with DRD, DRD-plus and DRD look-alike as many of them have excellent outcome with appropriate therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.