Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452903›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

Restricted kinematic alignment leads to uncompromised osseointegration of cementless total knee arthroplasty.

Guillaume Laforest, Lazaros Kostretzis, Marc-Olivier Kiss, Pascal-André Vendittoli

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Excellent results of restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Viability and Success of Noncemented Kinematic Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guillaume LaforestSurgery Department, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, 5415 Boul l'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
Lazaros KostretzisSurgery Department, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, 5415 Boul l'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
Marc-Olivier KissSurgery Department, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, 5415 Boul l'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
Pascal-André VendittoliSurgery Department, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, 5415 Boul l'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada. pa.vendittoli@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4652-6238

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile kinematic alignment (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented implants has been shown to provide equivalent or better results than mechanical alignment, its combination with cementless fixation has not yet been documented. The purpose of this study is to report (1) revision rate and causes, (2) clinical results based on patient report outcome measures (PROMs), and (3) radiological signs of implant dysfunction in patients with an uncemented TKA implanted with restricted KA (rKA), after a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

methodsThis study included the first 100 consecutive uncemented cruciate retaining TKAs implanted between November 2015 and February 2018 by a single surgeon following rKA principles. At last follow-up, all adverse events and PROMs assessed by WOMAC, KOOS, and FJS scores were documented. Radiographic evaluation was performed to identify signs of implant loosening.

resultsAfter a mean follow-up of 49 months (32, 60), no implant revision was performed for aseptic loosening. Three revisions were performed: one for malalignment, one for a deep infection, and one for instability. The mean WOMAC score was 20.1 (0-79, 21.3), the mean KOOS score was 71.5 (19.0-96.6, 19.8), and the mean FJS score was 65.9 (0-100, 29.6). No radiological evidence of implant aseptic loosening or osteolysis was identified.

conclusionThis study shows that in 99% of our cases, rKA combined with the tested cementless TKA implant allowed for adequate secondary fixation and good functional outcomes in the short term. Favourable mid- to long-term implant survivorship is anticipated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansKnee JointOsseointegrationProsthesis FailureTreatment OutcomeKinematic alignmentMechanicalSurvivalTotal knee arthroplastyTotal knee replacementUncemented

Identifiers

PMID33452903
PMCPMC8866348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.