Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452660›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2021

Hydroxychloroquine in the post-COVID-19 era: will this pandemic upset decades of clinical practice?

Lucie Pothen, Halil Yildiz, Mathilde Mbouck Samnick, Jean Cyr Yombi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucie PothenDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10 avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. lucie.pothen@uclouvain.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8424-0623
Halil YildizDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10 avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Mathilde Mbouck SamnickDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Saint Georges Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London, SW17 OQT, UK.
Jean Cyr YombiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10 avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BESt George's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, Belgian health authorities endorsed the interim guidelines for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia: hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) recommended for treatment of hospitalized patients with moderate to severe disease. As a growing number of patients were admitted, inevitably, our internal medicine team questioned the efficacy and safety of HCQ, especially with regard to cardiac side effects. In parallel with our concerns, data regarding the safety and efficacy of HCQ were published, with discordant results and debate in the medical community. Media coverage of the possible risks and benefits of HCQ use in COVID-19 also caused confusion amongst the public. In this Perspectives in Rheumatology article, we review the use and safety of HCQ in autoimmune disease and its putative efficacy and toxicity in COVID-19. Finally, we share our concern about the future of this widely used and inexpensive drug after the COVID-19 pandemic has passed.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntiviral AgentsAutoimmune DiseasesCardiotoxicityHumansHydroxychloroquineLupus Erythematosus, SystemicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsHydroxychloroquineAutoimmune diseaseCOVID-19HydroxychloroquineSystemic lupus erythematosusToxicity

Identifiers

PMID33452660
PMCPMC7810282
OpenAlexW3119605623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.