ArticleFolia microbiologica2021
Simultaneous use of polarization microscopy and dark field techniques in the study of microorganisms.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simultaneous use of Interphako interference contrast and polarization microscopy in the study of microorganisms.Folia microbiologica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Simultaneous application of polarization microscopy and dark field techniques has been used to study the internal structure of microbial cells. The dark field technique displays subtle cell structures like glowing objects on a dark background. In the polarizing microscope, cross polarizing filters along with the first-order quartz compensator and a rotary table show the maximum birefringence of the individual structures. The material containing microorganisms was collected in the villages of Sýkořice and Zbečno (Křivoklátsko Protected Landscape Area). The objects were studied in a laboratory microscope Carl Zeiss Jena type NfpK equipped with In Ph 160 basic body with variable dark field, special condenser with interchangeable diaphragm apertures, a rotary table, Meopta Praha polarizer, analyzer, first-order quartz compensator from LOMO Sankt Petersburg, and a digital Nikon D 70 DSLR camera. Three orders of microorganisms were studied: Siphonocladales, Chlorococcales, and Peritricha. Anisotropic structures in different amounts and sizes (e.g., granules and microfibrils) or in different configurations (e.g., cell walls or pellicle) have been found in all Protista organisms under study. Filamentous algae of the genus Cladophora (Cladophoraceae, Siphonocladales, Ulvophyceae) featured a strongly birefringent cell wall (shape birefringence) surrounded by less birefringent periphyton (microbial biofilm), at the edges of which cyanobacterial fibers could be recognized-a very important finding. The coccal algae of the genus Scenedesmus (Scenedesmataceae, Chlorococcales, Chlorophyceae) exhibited not only strongly birefringent granules, but also strongly birefringent microfibrils in the cytoplasm outside the strongly birefringent cell walls-very important finding. Of all the studied microorganisms, the weakest birefringence was shown in the surface membrane (pellicle) of the Vorticella (Vorticellidae, Peritricha, Ciliata). On the other hand, the ring of cilia on the top of the body had a somewhat stronger birefringence-an important finding. In conclusion, the dark field technique provides a high contrast image in the microscope and, if supplemented simultaneously by polarization microscopy, will allow us to partially infer the composition of the examined structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.