SynthesisEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021
Sensors for indoor air quality monitoring and assessment through Internet of Things: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitigating indoor risk of airborne infections using COJournal of environmental health science & engineering · 2026Article
- Air Pollution Monitoring with Nanoscaled Materials in Chemoresistive Gas Sensors.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Review
- Low-Cost Sensor Systems and IoT Technologies for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring: Instrumentation, Models, Implementation, and Perspectives for Validation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A New Wearable System for Personal Air Pollution Exposure Estimation: Pilot Observational Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Observational
- A Retrospective Analysis of Indoor COSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Multisensor Device Intended as an IoT Element for Indoor Environment Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Carbon based sensors for air quality monitoring networks; middle east perspective.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Review
- Public engagement with air quality data: using health behaviour change theory to support exposure-minimising behaviours.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2023Review
- A Novel IoT-Enabled Wireless Sensor Grid for Spatial and Temporal Evaluation of Tracer Gas Dispersion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Testing Thermostatic Bath End-Scale Stability for Calibration Performance with a Multiple-Sensor Ensemble Using ARIMA, Temporal Stochastics and a Quantum Walker Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- A Scoping Review on Wearable Devices for Environmental Monitoring and Their Application for Health and Wellness.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Marvin: An Innovative Omni-Directional Robotic Assistant for Domestic Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- ADFIST: Adaptive Dynamic Fuzzy Inference System Tree Driven by Optimized Knowledge Base for Indoor Air Quality Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Digital Healthcare for Airway Diseases from Personal Environmental Exposure.Yonsei medical journal · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing populations around the world are closely associated with rising levels of air pollution. The impact is not restricted to outdoor areas. Moreover, the health of building occupants is also deteriorating due to poor indoor air quality. As per the World Health Organization, indoor air pollution is a leading cause of 1.6 million premature deaths annually. Therefore, numerous companies have started the development of low-cost sensors to monitor indoor air pollution with the Internet of Things-based applications. However, due to the close association of air pollution levels to the mortality and morbidity rates, communities face several limitations while selecting sensors to address this public health challenge. The main contribution of this systematic review is to present a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of low-cost sensors while providing deep insights into the selection criteria for adequate monitoring. The authors in this paper discussed studies published after the year 2015, and it includes an analysis of papers published in the English language only. Moreover, this study highlights crucial research questions, states answers, and provides recommendations for future research studies. The outcomes of this paper will be useful for students, researchers, and industry members concerning the upcoming research and manufacturing activities. The results show that 28 studies (70%) include indoor thermal comfort assessment, 26 (65%) and 12 (30%) studies include CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
33452599What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.