Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452594›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2021

Routine postoperative computed tomography scan after craniotomy: systematic review and evidence-based recommendations.

Lukas Blumrich, João Paulo Mota Telles, Saul Almeida da Silva, Ricardo Ferrareto Iglesio, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Surgical Approaches for Possible Positions of an Olfactory Implant to Stimulate the Olfactory Bulb.ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lukas BlumrichDivision of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
João Paulo Mota TellesDivision of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9322-0405
Saul Almeida da SilvaDivision of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo Ferrareto IglesioDivision of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Manoel Jacobsen TeixeiraDivision of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eberval Gadelha FigueiredoDivision of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, Sao Paulo, Brazil. ebgadelha@yahoo.com.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few years, the role of early postoperative computed tomography (EPOCT) after cranial surgery has been repeatedly questioned, but there is yet no consensus on the practice. We conducted a systematic review to address the usefulness of EPOCT in association with neurological examination after elective craniotomies compared to the neurological examination alone. Studies were eligible if they provided information about the number of patients scanned, how many were asymptomatic or presented neurological deterioration before the scan and how many of each of those groups had their management changed due to imaging findings. CTs had to be performed in the first 48 h following surgery to be considered early. Eight studies were included. The retrospective studies enrolled a total of 3639 patients, with 3737 imaging examinations. Out of the 3696 CT scans performed in asymptomatic patients, less than 0.8% prompted an intervention, while 100% of patients with neurological deterioration were submitted to emergency surgery. Positive predictive values of altered scans were 0.584 for symptomatic patients and 0.125 for the asymptomatic. The number of altered scans necessary to predict (NNP) one change in management for the asymptomatic patients was 8, while for the clinically evident cases, it was 1.71. The number of scans needed to diagnose one clinically silent alteration is 134.75, and postoperative imaging of neurologically intact patients is 132 times less likely to issue an emergency intervention than an altered neurological examination alone. EPOCT following elective craniotomy in neurologically preserved patients is not supported by current evidence, and CT scanning should be performed only in particular conditions. The authors have developed an algorithm to help the judgment of each patient by the surgeon in a resource-limited context.

Indexed as

CraniotomyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesCraniotomyCritical careNeurosurgerySpiral computedTomography

Identifiers

PMID33452594
OpenAlexW3126116940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.