ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021
Gait analysis in the elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression improves gait quality and stance balance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal gait characteristics during single- and dual-task walking are associated with the burden of cerebral small vessel disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Gait analysis using digital biomarkers including smart shoes in lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Tracking the disease progression of lumbar spinal stenosis using objective gait metrics: a case report.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2022Article
- Research progress on multicomponent physical exercise for patients with neurocognitive impairment.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to analyze the gait characteristics of the elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis by an intelligent device for energy expenditure and activity (IDEEA) to assist clinical work.
methodsA total of 98 subjects were included in this study from January 2017 to December 2018. A total of 49 elderly outpatients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis in unilateral lower extremity were included as the experimental group, and another 49 healthy subjects matched with gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) were analyzed as the control group. The gait data of the subjects (including single support, double support, SLS/DLS, swing duration, step duration, cycle duration, pulling accel, swing power, ground impact, foot fall, foot off, push off, speed, cadence, step length, and stride length) were collected to compare between the experience group and control group, the affected leg and the healthy leg in experimental group.
resultsThe results of this study presented that small intermittent claudication occurred in all patients. The time of single support was significantly increased (p < 0.05). Double support, step duration, and pulling accel were increased (p < 0.05), and the Push off, speed, step length, and Stride length were decreased (p < 0.05) in the experimental group compared with the control group.
conclusionSmall intermittent claudication was the basic gait composition of the elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis that can reflect the abnormal gait characteristics by IDEEA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.