Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452372›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Variation of rhizosphere microbial community in continuous mono-maize seed production.

Yunchen Zhao, Wenjiang Fu, Changwei Hu, Guangquan Chen, Zhanwen Xiao, Yuru Chen, Zhijiang Wang, Hongyu Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  7. Co-expression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effects ofPlant direct · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yunchen ZhaoSchool of Agriculture and Ecological Engineering, Hexi University, Zhangye, 734000, Gansu, China. yr1826@126.com.
Wenjiang FuSchool of Agriculture and Ecological Engineering, Hexi University, Zhangye, 734000, Gansu, China.
Changwei HuCollege of Biological, Chemical Science and Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314000, Zhejiang, China. changwei.hu@163.com.
Guangquan ChenSchool of Agriculture and Ecological Engineering, Hexi University, Zhangye, 734000, Gansu, China.
Zhanwen XiaoSchool of Agriculture and Ecological Engineering, Hexi University, Zhangye, 734000, Gansu, China.
Yuru ChenSchool of Food Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China.
Zhijiang WangSchool of Agriculture and Ecological Engineering, Hexi University, Zhangye, 734000, Gansu, China.
Hongyu ChengSchool of Agriculture and Ecological Engineering, Hexi University, Zhangye, 734000, Gansu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil microbe is crucial to a healthy soil, therefore its diversities and abundances under different conditions are still need fully understand.The aims of the study were to characterize the community structure and diversity of microbe in the rhizosphere soil after continuous maize seed production, and the relationship between the disease incidence of four diseases and the variation of the rhizosphere microbe. The results showed that different fungal and bacterial species were predominant in different cropping year, and long-term maize seed production had a huge impact on structure and diversity of soil microbial. Ascomycota and Mortierellomycota were the dominant fungal phyla and Mortierella and Ascomycetes represented for a large proportion of genus. A relative increase of Fusarium and Gibberella and a relative decrease of Mortierella, Chrysosporium, Podospora, and Chaetomium were observed with the increase of cropping year. Pathogenic Fusarium, Curvularia, Curvularia-lunata, Cladosporium, Gibberella-baccata, and Plectosphaerellaceae were over-presented and varied at different continuous cropping year, led to different maize disease incidence. Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria ranked in the top two of all bacterial phyla, and genus Pseudarthrobacter, Roseiflexus and RB41 dominated top 3. Haliangium and Streptomyces decreased with the continuous cropping year and mono-cropping of maize seed production increased disease incidence with the increase of cropping year, while the major disease was different. Continuous cropping of maize seed production induced the decrease of protective microbe and biocontrol genera, while pathogenic pathogen increased, and maize are in danger of pathogen invasion. Field management show great effects on soil microbial community.

Indexed as

RhizosphereAgricultureBacteriaBiodiversityMicrobiotaPlant DiseasesPlant RootsSeedsSoilSoil MicrobiologyZea maysSoil

Identifiers

PMID33452372
PMCPMC7810720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.