ArticleScientific reports2021
Implicit motor learning within three trials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Active inference and speech motor control.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Modeling human visuomotor adaptation with a disturbance observer framework.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Implicit adaptation's effect on sensorimotor and motor confidence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Timing of responses to gradual and abrupt visuo-proprioceptive cue conflict with and without feedback.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Attenuation of implicit motor learning with consecutive exposure to visual errors.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- "Leap before you look": Conditions that suppress explicit, knowledge-based learning during visuomotor adaptation.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2024Article
- Article
- Imprecise perception of hand position during early motor adaptation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Action does not drive visual biases in peri-tool space.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Contribution of implicit memory to adaptation of movement extent during reaching against unpredictable spring-like loads: insensitivity to intentional suppression of kinematic performance.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Reinforcement learning establishes a minimal metacognitive process to monitor and control motor learning performance.Nature communications · 2023Article
- A reliable and efficient adaptive Bayesian method to assess static lower limb position sense.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2023Article
- Changes in body perception following virtual object manipulation are accompanied by changes of the internal reference scale.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A reliable and efficient adaptive Bayesian method to assess static lower limb position sense.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Adapting to visuomotor rotations in stepped increments increases implicit motor learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Error Size Shape Relationships between Motor Variability and Implicit Motor Adaptation.Biology · 2023Article
- Highlights from the 31st Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neural Control of Movement.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In motor learning, the slow development of implicit learning is traditionally taken for granted. While much is known about training performance during adaptation to a perturbation in reaches, saccades and locomotion, little is known about the time course of the underlying implicit processes during normal motor adaptation. Implicit learning is characterized by both changes in internal models and state estimates of limb position. Here, we measure both as reach aftereffects and shifts in hand localization in our participants, after every training trial. The observed implicit changes were near asymptote after only one to three perturbed training trials and were not predicted by a two-rate model's slow process that is supposed to capture implicit learning. Hence, we show that implicit learning is much faster than conventionally believed, which has implications for rehabilitation and skills training.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.