ArticleScientific reports2021
A high-throughput cell-based assay pipeline for the preclinical development of bacterial DsbA inhibitors as antivirulence therapeutics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- 400 nm femtosecond laser irradiation eradicates mature MRSA biofilms and inhibits their formation via quorum sensing dysregulation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Structural and functional specialization of Bordetella pertussis DsbA for pertussis toxin folding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Femtosecond laser irradiation has an anti-virulence effect by reducing the adhesion and invasion of MRSA bacteria to human cells: an in vitro study.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Bacterial suppressor-of-copper-sensitivity proteins exhibit diverse thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase cellular functions.iScience · 2024Article
- Unveiling the versatility of the thioredoxin framework: Insights from the structural examination ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Exploring the modulatory impact of isosakuranetin onVirulence · 2023Article
- A Buried Water Network Modulates the Activity of theAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotics are failing fast, and the development pipeline remains alarmingly dry. New drug research and development is being urged by world health officials, with new antibacterials against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens as the highest priority. Antivirulence drugs, which inhibit bacterial pathogenicity factors, are a class of promising antibacterials, however, their development is stifled by lack of standardised preclinical testing akin to what guides antibiotic development. The lack of established target-specific microbiological assays amenable to high-throughput, often means that cell-based testing of virulence inhibitors is absent from the discovery (hit-to-lead) phase, only to be employed at later-stages of lead optimization. Here, we address this by establishing a pipeline of bacterial cell-based assays developed for the identification and early preclinical evaluation of DsbA inhibitors, previously identified by biophysical and biochemical assays. Inhibitors of DsbA block oxidative protein folding required for virulence factor folding in pathogens. Here we use existing Escherichia coli DsbA inhibitors and uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) as a model pathogen, to demonstrate that the combination of a cell-based sulfotransferase assay and a motility assay (both DsbA reporter assays), modified for a higher throughput format, can provide a robust and target-specific platform for the identification and evaluation of DsbA inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.