Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452354›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A high-throughput cell-based assay pipeline for the preclinical development of bacterial DsbA inhibitors as antivirulence therapeutics.

Anthony D Verderosa, Rabeb Dhouib, Yaoqin Hong, Taylah K Anderson, Begoña Heras, Makrina Totsika

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Buried Water Network Modulates the Activity of theAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony D VerderosaInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and Centre for Immunology and Infection Control, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.
Rabeb DhouibInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and Centre for Immunology and Infection Control, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.
Yaoqin HongInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and Centre for Immunology and Infection Control, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.
Taylah K AndersonInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and Centre for Immunology and Infection Control, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.
Begoña HerasDepartment of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Makrina TotsikaInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and Centre for Immunology and Infection Control, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia. makrina.totsika@qut.edu.au.
Queensland University of Technology · AULa Trobe University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics are failing fast, and the development pipeline remains alarmingly dry. New drug research and development is being urged by world health officials, with new antibacterials against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens as the highest priority. Antivirulence drugs, which inhibit bacterial pathogenicity factors, are a class of promising antibacterials, however, their development is stifled by lack of standardised preclinical testing akin to what guides antibiotic development. The lack of established target-specific microbiological assays amenable to high-throughput, often means that cell-based testing of virulence inhibitors is absent from the discovery (hit-to-lead) phase, only to be employed at later-stages of lead optimization. Here, we address this by establishing a pipeline of bacterial cell-based assays developed for the identification and early preclinical evaluation of DsbA inhibitors, previously identified by biophysical and biochemical assays. Inhibitors of DsbA block oxidative protein folding required for virulence factor folding in pathogens. Here we use existing Escherichia coli DsbA inhibitors and uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) as a model pathogen, to demonstrate that the combination of a cell-based sulfotransferase assay and a motility assay (both DsbA reporter assays), modified for a higher throughput format, can provide a robust and target-specific platform for the identification and evaluation of DsbA inhibitors.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsCrystallography, X-RayEscherichia coli ProteinsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesProtein FoldingVirulenceVirulence FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsdsbA protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID33452354
PMCPMC7810732
OpenAlexW3121361942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.