Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452314›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Substrate and cell fusion influence on slime mold network dynamics.

Fernando Patino-Ramirez, Chloé Arson, Audrey Dussutour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fernando Patino-RamirezSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA. fp@gatech.edu.
Chloé Arson *School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA.
Audrey Dussutour *Research Centre on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Centre for Integrative Biology (CBI), Toulouse University, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France. audrey.dussutour@univ-tlse3.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acellular slime mold Physarum polycephalum provides an excellent model to study network formation, as its network is remodelled constantly in response to mass gain/loss and environmental conditions. How slime molds networks are built and fuse to allow for efficient exploration and adaptation to environmental conditions is still not fully understood. Here, we characterize the network organization of slime molds exploring homogeneous neutral, nutritive and adverse environments. We developed a fully automated image analysis method to extract the network topology and followed the slime molds before and after fusion. Our results show that: (1) slime molds build sparse networks with thin veins in a neutral environment and more compact networks with thicker veins in a nutritive or adverse environment; (2) slime molds construct long, efficient and resilient networks in neutral and adverse environments, whereas in nutritive environments, they build shorter and more centralized networks; and (3) slime molds fuse rapidly and establish multiple connections with their clone-mates in a neutral environment, whereas they display a late fusion with fewer connections in an adverse environment. Our study demonstrates that slime mold networks evolve continuously via pruning and reinforcement, adapting to different environmental conditions.

Identifiers

PMID33452314
PMCPMC7810851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.