Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452288›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Acquisition of concrete and abstract words is modulated by tDCS of Wernicke's area.

Diana Kurmakaeva, Evgeny Blagovechtchenski, Daria Gnedykh, Nadezhda Mkrtychian, Svetlana Kostromina, Yury Shtyrov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diana Kurmakaeva *Laboratory of Behavioural Neurodynamics, Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, 199004, Russian Federation. diana.s-pb@mail.ru.
Evgeny Blagovechtchenski *Laboratory of Behavioural Neurodynamics, Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, 199004, Russian Federation.
Daria Gnedykh *Laboratory of Behavioural Neurodynamics, Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, 199004, Russian Federation.
Nadezhda Mkrtychian *Laboratory of Behavioural Neurodynamics, Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, 199004, Russian Federation.
Svetlana Kostromina *Laboratory of Behavioural Neurodynamics, Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, 199004, Russian Federation.
Yury Shtyrov *Laboratory of Behavioural Neurodynamics, Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, 199004, Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous behavioural and neuroimaging research suggested distinct cortical systems involved in processing abstract and concrete semantics; however, there is a dearth of causal evidence to support this. To address this, we applied anodal, cathodal, or sham (placebo) tDCS over Wernicke's area before a session of contextual learning of novel concrete and abstract words (n = 10 each), presented five times in short stories. Learning effects were assessed at lexical and semantic levels immediately after the training and, to attest any consolidation effects of overnight sleep, on the next day. We observed successful learning of all items immediately after the session, with decreased performance in Day 2 assessment. Importantly, the results differed between stimulation conditions and tasks. Whereas the accuracy of semantic judgement for abstract words was significantly lower in the sham and anodal groups on Day 2 vs. Day 1, no significant performance drop was observed in the cathodal group. Similarly, the cathodal group showed no significant overnight performance reduction in the free recall task for either of the stimuli, unlike the other two groups. Furthermore, between-group analysis showed an overall better performance of both tDCS groups over the sham group, particularly expressed for abstract semantics and cathodal stimulation. In sum, the results suggest overlapping but diverging brain mechanisms for concrete and abstract semantics and indicate a larger degree of involvement of core language areas in storing abstract knowledge. Furthermore, they demonstrate a possiblity to improve learning outcomes using neuromodulatory techniques.

Identifiers

PMID33452288
PMCPMC7811021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.