Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452277›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests.

Thomas Asbeck, Francesco Sabatini, Andrey L D Augustynczik, Marco Basile, Jan Helbach, Marlotte Jonker, Anna Knuff, Jürgen Bauhus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structural characteristics mediate forest mitigation potential against climate change and biodiversity loss.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas AsbeckChair of Silviculture, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. thomas.asbeck@waldbau.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4786-9312
Francesco SabatiniGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) - Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7202-7697
Andrey L D AugustynczikChair of Forestry Economy and Forest Planning, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Marco BasileChair of Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Jan HelbachChair of Geobotany, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestrasse 1, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Marlotte JonkerChair of Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Anna KnuffChair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Jürgen BauhusChair of Silviculture, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managed forests are a key component of strategies aimed at tackling the climate and biodiversity crises. Tapping this potential requires a better understanding of the complex, simultaneous effects of forest management on biodiversity, carbon stocks and productivity. Here, we used data of 135 one-hectare plots from southwestern Germany to disentangle the relative influence of gradients of management intensity, carbon stocks and forest productivity on different components of forest biodiversity (birds, bats, insects, plants) and tree-related microhabitats. We tested whether the composition of taxonomic groups varies gradually or abruptly along these gradients. The richness of taxonomic groups was rather insensitive to management intensity, carbon stocks and forest productivity. Despite the low explanatory power of the main predictor variables, forest management had the greatest relative influence on richness of insects and tree-related microhabitats, while carbon stocks influenced richness of bats, birds, vascular plants and pooled taxa. Species composition changed relatively abruptly along the management intensity gradient, while changes along carbon and productivity gradients were more gradual. We conclude that moderate increases in forest management intensity and carbon stocks, within the range of variation observed in our study system, might be compatible with biodiversity and climate mitigation objectives in managed forests.

Indexed as

BiodiversityForestsAnimalsBirdsCarbonInsectaPlantsCarbon

Identifiers

PMID33452277
PMCPMC7810709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.