Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452222›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Visual Attention Modulates Glutamate-Glutamine Levels in Vestibular Cortex: Evidence from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Sebastian M Frank, Lisa Forster, Maja Pawellek, Wilhelm M Malloni, Sinyeob Ahn, Peter U Tse, Mark W Greenlee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Beyond Latency: ChronicBiomedicines · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Vestibular-Evoked Cerebral Potentials.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian M FrankInstitute for Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany sebastian_frank@brown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7028-8754
Lisa ForsterInstitute for Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Maja PawellekInstitute for Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Wilhelm M MalloniInstitute for Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Sinyeob AhnSiemens Healthcare, San Francisco, California 94123.
Peter U TseDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755.
Mark W GreenleeInstitute for Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2305-9286
University of Regensburg · DEDartmouth College · USSiemens Healthcare (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attending to a stimulus enhances the neuronal responses to it, while responses to nonattended stimuli are not enhanced and may even be suppressed. Although the neural mechanisms of response enhancement for attended stimuli have been intensely studied, the neural mechanisms underlying attentional suppression remain largely unknown. It is uncertain whether attention acts to suppress the processing in sensory cortical areas that would otherwise process the nonattended stimulus or the subcortical input to these cortical areas. Moreover, the neurochemical mechanisms inducing a reduction or suppression of neuronal responses to nonattended stimuli are as yet unknown. Here, we investigated how attention directed toward visual processing cross-modally acts to suppress vestibular responses in the human brain. By using functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy in a group of female and male subjects, we find that attention to visual motion downregulates in a load-dependent manner the concentration of excitatory neurotransmitter (glutamate and its precursor glutamine, referred to together as Glx) within the parietoinsular vestibular cortex (PIVC), a core cortical area of the vestibular system, while leaving the concentration of inhibitory neurotransmitter (GABA) in PIVC unchanged. This makes PIVC less responsive to excitatory thalamic vestibular input, as corroborated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Together, our results suggest that attention acts to suppress the processing of nonattended sensory cues cortically by neurochemically rendering the core cortical area of the nonattended sensory modality less responsive to excitatory thalamic input.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionCerebral CortexFemaleGlutamic AcidGlutamineHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMalePhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung AdultGlutamic AcidGlutamineattentionmagnetic resonance spectroscopyparietoinsular vestibular cortexsuppressionthalamusvestibular system

Identifiers

PMID33452222
PMCPMC7939083
OpenAlexW3124890508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.