Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452131›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2021

Perceptions of an HIV self-testing intervention and its potential role in addressing the barriers to HIV testing among at-risk heterosexual men: a qualitative analysis.

Yi-Roe Tan, Nashwinder Kaur, Angeline Jiajun Ye, Yiwen Zhang, Jerald Xuan Zheng Lim, Rayner Kay Jin Tan, Lai Peng Ho, Mark I-Cheng Chen, Mee Lian Wong, Chen Seong Wong and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Preferences for oral-World journal of methodology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yi-Roe TanNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4013-7330
Nashwinder KaurNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Angeline Jiajun YeSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yiwen ZhangSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jerald Xuan Zheng LimYale-NUS College, Singapore.
Rayner Kay Jin TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9188-3368
Lai Peng HoNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.
Mark I-Cheng ChenSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9369-5830
Mee Lian WongSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Chen Seong WongNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore Chen_Seong_Wong@ncid.sg.
Peiling YapNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVoluntary HIV testing rates are still low in several Asian countries including Singapore. HIV self-testing (HIVST) has the potential to increase testing, leading to earlier diagnosis and better prognosis. However, the views of at-risk individuals, especially heterosexual men (HSM), who are not coming forward for testing are still poorly understood. In this study, we examined the barriers and facilitators to and delivery preferences for HIVST in order to implement an effective intervention in Singapore.

methodsFrom May 2017 to June 2018, 48 in-depth interviews were conducted with HSM aged 21-66 years and at risk of HIV infection. Participants were purposively sampled based on ethnicity, age and testing behaviour. Recruitment was done mainly at brothels and entertainment establishments in Singapore. Participants gave their views on HIV testing, factors affecting HIVST use and their preferred HIVST service delivery model.

resultsMost participants preferred HIVST over conventional testing for its convenience, privacy, anonymity and autonomy, but older men still preferred conventional testing. Low self-perceived risk, low awareness and self-efficacy for HIVST, and non-comprehensive test for other STIs were reported as barriers to HIVST. There were mixed opinions on kit preference. A blood-based kit was favoured for higher accuracy, while the oral-fluid-based kit was favoured for ease of use. Participants wanted a human touch for post-test counselling and linkage to care only if they self-tested positive. Traditional media, internet and social media, and venue-based outreach were potential advertising platforms mentioned.

conclusionsA locally acceptable and feasible HIVST intervention must address the barriers and facilitators of using HIVST in order to improve HIV testing rates among this at-risk population who might otherwise delay or fail to present for testing.

Indexed as

PerceptionSelf-TestingAdultAgedHeterosexualityHIV InfectionsHIV TestingHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchSingaporeYoung Adultbehavioural sciencesheterosexualityHIVimplementation sciencequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID33452131
PMCPMC8543206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.