Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33452025›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2021

Colonization of Naive Roots from

F Fracchia, L Mangeot-Peter, L Jacquot, F Martin, C Veneault-Fourrey, A Deveau

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Role of Plant Growth Regulators in AdventitiousPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PeerJ · 2023
    Article
  13. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

F Fracchia *Université de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France.
L Mangeot-Peter *Université de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France.
L JacquotUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France.
F MartinUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France.
C Veneault-Fourrey *Université de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France.
A Deveau *Université de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France aurelie.deveau@inrae.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-6266-5241
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRBeijing Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through their roots, trees interact with a highly complex community of microorganisms belonging to various trophic guilds and contributing to tree nutrition, development, and protection against stresses. Tree roots select for specific microbial species from the bulk soil communities. The root microbiome formation is a dynamic process, but little is known on how the different microorganisms colonize the roots and how the selection occurs. To decipher whether the final composition of the root microbiome is the product of several waves of colonization by different guilds of microorganisms, we planted sterile rooted cuttings of gray poplar obtained from plantlets propagated in axenic conditions in natural poplar stand soil. We analyzed the root microbiome at different time points between 2 and 50 days of culture by combining high-throughput Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the fungal ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer and bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons with confocal laser scanning microscopy observations. The microbial colonization of poplar roots took place in three stages, but bacteria and fungi had different dynamics. Root bacterial communities were clearly different from those in the soil after 2 days of culture. In contrast, if fungi were also already colonizing roots after 2 days, the initial communities were very close to that in the soil and were dominated by saprotrophs. They were slowly replaced by endophytes and ectomycorhizal fungi. The replacement of the most abundant fungal and bacterial community members observed in poplar roots over time suggest potential competition effect between microorganisms and/or a selection by the host.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyBacteriaFungiMicrobiotaPlant RootsPopulusRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Smetabarcodingmicroorganismsmicroscopypoplarroot colonization

Identifiers

PMID33452025
PMCPMC8105020
OpenAlexW3121901182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.