Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33451364›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

Roles dissemination and implementation scientists can play in supporting research teams.

Rachel G Tabak, Ana A Bauman, Jodi Summers Holtrop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel G TabakPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. rtabak@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2967-3906
Ana A BaumanBrown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1196, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Jodi Summers HoltropDepartment of Family Medicine and Dissemination and Implementation Research Program of the Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Washington University Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control (WU-ISCCC)P50CA244431 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2019 to 2023
$8.0M
Pragmatic Implementation Science Approaches to Assess and Enhance Value of Cancer Prevention and Control in Rural Primary CareP50CA244688 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GLASGOW, RUSSELL E · 2019 to 2023
$4.9M
Developing T4 Translational Research Capacity for Control of Hypertension in RwandaU24HL136790 · NHLBI · RASD RWANDA · PI MUTIMURA, EUGENE · 2017 to 2020
$596k
HEME PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONR01HL013399 · NHLBI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI PEISACH, JACK · 1985 to 1987
–
ACL HHS U48DP006395CDC HHS U48DP006395NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006395NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244431NCI NIH HHS P50CA244431NCI NIH HHS P50CA244668NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244688NHLBI NIH HHS 3U01HL13399403S1NHLBI NIH HHS 5U24HL136790NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL136790NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK092950NIGMS NIH HHS UL1TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of dissemination and implementation (D&I) science is rapidly growing, with many scientists seeking to apply D&I science to enhance and expand the impact of their work. As the D&I field grows and collaborations of implementation scientists with other fields flourish, a description for the roles for D&I scientists as they collaborate with researchers from other fields could be beneficial. This paper exemplifies how the D&I scientist/researcher collaborative process might work and important elements to consider in doing so, as well as provide an outline on how collaborations might progress for different project needs. This is discussed through example scenarios to consider an implementation scientists' engagement in a research project and describe potential roles for implementation scientists in supporting research teams. We then discuss characteristics to consider when incorporating a D&I expert into a team and considerations in navigating the scenarios.

Indexed as

Collaboration in implementation scienceEducation on implementation scienceFunding of implementation science

Identifiers

PMID33451364
PMCPMC7811259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.