Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33451328›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Optimising the integration of technology-enabled solutions to enhance primary mental health care: a service mapping study.

Haley M LaMonica, Tracey A Davenport, Antonia Ottavio, Shelley C Rowe, Shane P Cross, Frank Iorfino, Tanya A Jackson, Michael A Easton, Jennifer Melsness, Ian B Hickie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterising variability in youth mental health service populations: A detailed and scalable approach using digital technology.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haley M LaMonicaBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. haley.lamonica@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6563-5467
Tracey A DavenportBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Antonia OttavioBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Shelley C RoweBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Shane P CrossBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Frank IorfinoBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Tanya A JacksonInnoWell Pty Ltd, Shop 1-3/66-70 Parramatta Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Michael A EastonInnoWell Pty Ltd, Shop 1-3/66-70 Parramatta Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Jennifer MelsnessInnoWell Pty Ltd, Shop 1-3/66-70 Parramatta Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Ian B HickieBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the widely acknowledged potential for health information technologies to improve the accessibility, quality and clinical safety of mental health care, implementation of such technologies in services is frequently unsuccessful due to varying consumer, health professional, and service-level factors. The objective of this co-design study was to use process mapping (i.e. service mapping) to illustrate the current consumer journey through primary mental health services, identify barriers to and facilitators of quality mental health care, and highlight potential points at which to integrate the technology-enabled solution to optimise the provision of care based on key service performance indicators.

methodsInteractive, discussion-based workshops of up to six hours were conducted with representative stakeholders from each participating service, including health professionals, service managers and administrators from Open Arms - Veterans & Families Counselling Service (Sydney), a counselling service for veterans and their families, and five headspace centres in the North Coast Primary Health Network, primary youth mental health services. Service maps were drafted and refined in real time during the workshops. Through both group discussion and the use of post-it notes, participants worked together to evaluate performance indicators (e.g. safety) at each point in the consumer journey (e.g. intake) to indicate points of impact for the technology-enabled solution, reviewing and evaluating differing opinions in order to reach consensus.

resultsParticipants (n=84 across participating services) created service maps illustrating the current consumer journey through the respective services and highlighting barriers to and facilitators of quality mental health care. By consensus, the technology-enabled solution as facilitated by the InnoWell Platform was noted to enable the early identification of risk, reduce or eliminate lengthy intake processes, enable routine outcome monitoring to revise treatment plans in relation to consumer response, and serve as a personal data record for consumers, driving person-centred, coordinated care.

conclusionsService mapping was shown to be an effective methodology to understand the consumer's journey through a service and served to highlight how the co-designed technology-enabled solution can optimise service pathways to improve the accessibility, quality and clinical safety of care relative to key service performance indicators, facilitating the delivery of the right care.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesAdolescentCounselingHumansTechnologyDigital health solutionsHealth information technologyMental healthMental health services reformService mappingService performance indicators

Identifiers

PMID33451328
PMCPMC7811218
OpenAlexW3122898666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.