Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33451312›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Peer victimisation during adolescence and its impact on wellbeing in adulthood: a prospective cohort study.

Jessica M Armitage, R Adele H Wang, Oliver S P Davis, Lucy Bowes, Claire M A Haworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica M ArmitageSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK. jessica.armitage@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0929-9956
R Adele H WangMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7961-8027
Oliver S P DavisMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6448-3684
Lucy BowesDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5645-3875
Claire M A HaworthSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8608-289X

Funding

Alan Turing Institute EP/N510129/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/7National Institute for Health Research BRC-1215-20011Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105612/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeer victimisation is a common occurrence and has well-established links with a range of psychiatric problems in adulthood. Significantly less is known however, about how victimisation influences positive aspects of mental health such as wellbeing. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess for the first time, whether peer victimisation in adolescence is associated with adult wellbeing. We aimed to understand whether individuals who avoid a diagnosis of depression after victimisation, maintain good wellbeing in later life, and therefore display resilience.

methodsLongitudinal data was taken from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a prospective cohort study based in the UK. Peer victimisation was assessed at 13 years using a modified version of the bullying and friendship interview schedule, and wellbeing at age 23 using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. The presence or absence of depression was diagnosed using the Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised at 18 years. A series of logistic and linear regression analyses were used to explore relationships between peer victimisation, depression, and wellbeing, adjusting for potentially confounding individual and family factors.

resultsJust over 15% of victims of frequent bullying had a diagnosis of depression at age 18. Victimisation also had a significant impact on wellbeing, with a one-point increase in frequent victimisation associated with a 2.71-point (SE = 0.46, p < 0.001) decrease in wellbeing scores aged 23. This finding remained after adjustment for the mediating and moderating effects of depression, suggesting that the burden of victimisation extends beyond depression to impact wellbeing. Results therefore show that individuals who remain partially resilient by avoiding a diagnosis of depression after victimisation have significantly poorer wellbeing than their non-victimised counterparts.

conclusionOverall, our study demonstrates for the first time that victimisation during adolescence is a significant risk factor for not only the onset of depression, but also poor wellbeing in adulthood. Such findings highlight the importance of investigating both dimensions of mental health to understand the true burden of victimisation and subsequent resilience. In addition to the need for interventions that reduce the likelihood of depression following adolescent victimisation, efforts should also be made to promote good wellbeing.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsAdolescentAdultChildHumansLongitudinal StudiesPeer GroupProspective StudiesYoung AdultAdolescenceALSPACDepressionResilienceVictimisationWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID33451312
PMCPMC7811215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.