Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33451305›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2021

Mental health planning at a very early stage of the COVID-19 crisis: a systematic review of online international strategies and recommendations.

Nerea Almeda, Carlos García-Alonso, Luis Salvador-Carulla

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Study on Online Intervention for Early Childhood Eating Disorders during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. COVID-19 mental health challenges: A scoping review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Active Coping and Anxiety Symptoms during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spanish Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nerea AlmedaDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain. nmalmeda@uloyola.es.ORCID 0000-0002-6477-5142
Carlos García-AlonsoDepartment of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9001-9818
Luis Salvador-CarullaCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-9866

Funding

Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía PY18-RE-0022Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/01521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health care systems have been dramatically affected by COVID-19. Containment measures have been imposed, with negative consequences on population mental health. Therefore, an increase in both symptomatology and mental disorder incidence is expected. This research aims to identify, describe and assess the empirical background on online strategies and recommendations developed by international organizations and governments to cope with the psychological impact of COVID-19 at a very early stage of the pandemic.

methodsThe PRISMA guidelines were adapted to review online documents. A new questionnaire was developed to identify the existence of common patterns in the selected documents. Questions were classified into three domains: COVID-19 information, mental health strategies and mental health recommendations. A two-step cluster analysis was carried out to highlight underlying behaviours in the data (patterns). The results are shown as spider graphs (pattern profiles) and conceptual maps (multidimensional links between questions).

resultsTwenty-six documents were included in the review. The questionnaire analysed document complexity and identified their common key mental health characteristics (i.e., does the respondent have the tools for dealing with stress, depression and anxiety?). Cluster analysis highlighted patterns from the questionnaire domains. Strong relationships between questions were identified, such as psychological tips for maintaining good mental health and coping with COVID-19 (question n° 4), describing some psychological skills to help people cope with anxiety and worry about COVID-19 (question n° 6) and promoting social connection at home (question n° 8).

conclusionsWhen fast results are needed to develop health strategies and policies, rapid reviews associated with statistical and graphical methods are essential. The results obtained from the proposed analytical procedure can be relevant to a) classify documents according to their complexity in structuring the information provided on how to cope with the psychological impact of COVID-19, b) develop new documents according to specific objectives matching population needs, c) improve document design to face unforeseen events, and d) adapt new documents to local situations. In this framework, the relevance of adapting e-mental health procedures to community mental health care model principles was highlighted, although some problems related to the digital gap must be considered.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthHealth PlanningHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19Mental healthRecommendationsStrategiesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33451305
PMCPMC7809644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.