Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33450972›Full record

Trial reportCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Feasibility of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Examining a Multidimensional Intervention in Women with Gynecological Cancer at Risk of Lymphedema.

Shirin M Shallwani, Anna Towers, Anne Newman, Shannon Salvador, Angela Yung, Lucy Gilbert, Walter H Gotlieb, Xing Zeng, Doneal Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Experience of family caregivers of breast cancer-related lymphedema patients participating in lymphedema management: a phenomenological study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shirin M ShallwaniLymphedema Program, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3S5, Canada.
Anna TowersLymphedema Program, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3S5, Canada.
Anne NewmanLymphedema Program, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3S5, Canada.
Shannon SalvadorGynecologic Oncology Program, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Angela YungLymphedema Program, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3S5, Canada.
Lucy GilbertDepartment of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada.
Walter H GotliebDepartment of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada.
Xing ZengGynecologic Oncology Division, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2754-7650
Doneal ThomasLymphedema Program, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3S5, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CAJewish General Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited knowledge on non-invasive lymphedema risk-reduction strategies for women with gynecological cancer. Understanding factors influencing the feasibility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can guide future research. Our objectives are to report on the design and feasibility of a pilot RCT examining a tailored multidimensional intervention in women treated for gynecological cancer at risk of lymphedema and to explore the preliminary effectiveness of the intervention on lymphedema incidence at 12 months. In this pilot single-blinded, parallel-group, multi-centre RCT, women with newly diagnosed gynecological cancer were randomized to receive post-operative compression stockings and individualized exercise education (intervention group: IG) or education on lymphedema risk-reduction alone (control group: CG). Rates of recruitment, retention and assessment completion were recorded. Intervention safety and feasibility were tracked by monitoring adverse events and adherence. Clinical outcomes were evaluated over 12 months: presence of lymphedema, circumferential and volume measures, body composition and quality of life. Fifty-one women were recruited and 36 received the assigned intervention. Rates of recruitment and 12-month retention were 47% and 78%, respectively. Two participants experienced post-operative cellulitis, prior to intervention delivery. At three and six months post-operatively, 67% and 63% of the IG used compression ≥42 h/week, while 56% engaged in ≥150 weekly minutes of moderate-vigorous exercise. The cumulative incidence of lymphedema at 12 months was 31% in the CG and 31.9% in the IG (

Indexed as

LymphedemaNeoplasmsExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPilot Projectscellulitiscompressionedemaexercisefeasibilitygynecological cancerlymphedemaphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID33450972
PMCPMC7903266
OpenAlexW3120772929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.