Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33450658›Full record

ReviewESMO open2021

Flexible care in breast cancer.

A Wardley, J-L Canon, L Elsten, C Peña Murillo, T Badovinac Crnjevic, J Fredriksson, M Piccart

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Flexible nursing in patients with lung cancer who received chemotherapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

A WardleyNIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility at The Christie and Division of Cancer Sciences and University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
J-L CanonService d'Oncologie-Hématologie, Site Notre-Dame, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi (GHdC), Charleroi, Belgium.
L ElstenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
C Peña MurilloGlobal Product Development, Medical Affairs, Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
T Badovinac CrnjevicPDO - Clinical Science Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
J FredrikssonGlobal Product Development, Medical Affairs, Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
M PiccartInstitut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: martine.piccart@bordet.be.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLGrand Charleroi Hospital · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of patients with cancer in hospitals or clinics is resource-intensive and imposes a burden on patients. 'Flexible care' is a term that can be used to describe treatment administered outside the oncology ward, oncological outpatient clinic or office-based oncologist setting. Programmes that reduce travel burden by bringing cancer treatment to the patient's home, workplace or closer to the patient's home, in the form of satellite clinics or mobile cancer units, expand treatment capacity and are well received. Clinical trial data show that, compared with intravenous administration, subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of trastuzumab is preferred by patients with breast cancer (BC), saves healthcare professionals' (HCPs) time, reduces drug preparation and administration time and reduces direct and indirect costs. As such, s.c. trastuzumab is well suited to flexible care. The results of a Belgian study (BELIS) show that home administration of s.c. trastuzumab is feasible and preferred by patients with BC. Numerous programmes and pilot studies in Europe show that s.c. trastuzumab can be administered effectively in the patient's home, in primary care settings or local hospitals. Such programmes require planning, training, careful patient selection and technology to link patients, caregivers and specialists in oncology clinics. Once these elements are in place, flexible care offers patients with BC a choice of how treatment may be delivered and lead to improved quality of life, while reducing pressure on HCPs and hospitals. The concept of flexible care is particularly relevant amid the COVID-19 pandemic where guidelines have been developed encouraging remote care.

Indexed as

Home Care Services, Hospital-BasedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBreast NeoplasmsCOVID-19FemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMedical OncologyPandemicsQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2TrastuzumabAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalTrastuzumabat-home careCOVID-19remote cancer caresubcutaneous administrationtrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID33450658
PMCPMC7811121
OpenAlexW3119049112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.