Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33450398›Full record

ReviewAnnals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology2021

The use of microarray and other multiplex technologies in the diagnosis of allergy.

Behnam Keshavarz, Thomas A E Platts-Mills, Jeffrey M Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Occupational Allergy to Rat and Mouse in Research Laboratories.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gastropod Allergy: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Modern Concept of Molecular Diagnostics of Allergy to Dogs.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Behnam KeshavarzDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Thomas A E Platts-MillsDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Jeffrey M WilsonDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: jmw2gc@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

IgE antibodies to the mammalian oligosaccharide galactose-alpha-1, 3-galactose (alpha-gal): immunology, epidemiology and relevance to allergic and inflammatory diseaseR37AI020565 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI THOMAS A. PLATTS-MILLS · 1992 to 2026
$8.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI020565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo give an overview and describe the strengths and weaknesses of immunoglobulin E (IgE) microarray and other multiplex assays that have been developed and are being used for allergy diagnostics. DATA SOURCES: Queries for IgE microarray and multiplex assays were conducted with PubMed and Google Scholar, searching for primary articles and review papers. STUDY SELECTIONS: We focused on articles written in English on commercially available IgE multiplex assays that were reported in the allergy and immunology literature.

resultsSeveral commercial IgE assays that use microarray or other multiplex technology have been developed, and some have been implemented into clinical practice in Europe and Asia, with the Immuno Solid-Phase Allergen Chip being the most widely studied. Results of these assays generally correlate with results using "singleplex" IgE assays (eg, ImmunoCAP), though there can be variability among products and among allergens. A strength of the microarray technology is that IgE to a large number of allergens can be detected simultaneously in a single test, and only a small amount of patient serum is required. Cost, inadequate sensitivity under some scenarios, and difficulties with data interpretation, in some cases of 100 or more allergens, can be limitations.

conclusionIgE microarray assays are already a valuable tool in research applications. These assays, and also other forms of IgE multiplex assays, are likely to play an important role in the clinical practice of allergy in the future. Additional studies focused on clinical outcomes, and the development of more targeted allergen panels could facilitate increased clinical use.

Indexed as

AllergensHumansHypersensitivityImmunoglobulin EImmunologic TestsMicroarray AnalysisTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAllergensImmunoglobulin E

Identifiers

PMID33450398
PMCPMC9107268
OpenAlexW3118886849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.