Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33449339›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2021

Frailty and potentially inappropriate medications using the 2019 Beers Criteria: findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH).

Kaeshaelya Thiruchelvam, Julie Byles, Syed Shahzad Hasan, Nicholas Egan, Therese Kairuz

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kaeshaelya ThiruchelvamUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. kaeshaelyathiruchelvam@uon.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3754-1690
Julie BylesUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3984-6877
Syed Shahzad HasanUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-2215
Nicholas EganUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0854-7444
Therese KairuzUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3311-187X
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUIMU University · MYUniversity of Huddersfield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty is an essential consideration with potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), especially among older women.

aimsThis study determined the use of potentially inappropriate medications according to frailty status using the Beers Criteria 2019, identified medications that should be flagged as potentially inappropriate and harmful depending on individual health factors, and determined the association between frailty and PIMs, adjusted for characteristics associated with PIMs.

methodsThis prospective longitudinal study included 9355 participants aged 77-82 years at baseline (2003). Frailty was measured using the FRAIL (fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness and loss of weight) scale. Generalised estimating equations using log-binomial regressions determined the association between frailty and risk of using PIMs.

resultsAmong participants who were frail and non-frail at baseline, the majority used ≥ 3 PIMs (74.2% and 58.5%, respectively). At 2017, the proportion using ≥ 3 PIMs remained constant in the frail group (72.0%) but increased in the non-frail group (66.0%). Commonly prescribed medications that may be potentially inappropriate in both groups included benzodiazepines, proton-pump inhibitors and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and risperidone was an additional contributor in the non-frail group. When adjusted for other characteristics, frail women had a 2% higher risk of using PIMs (RR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01, 1.03).

conclusionGiven that the majority of frail women were using medications that may have been potentially inappropriate, it is important to consider both frailty and PIMs as indicators of health outcomes, and to review the need for PIMs for women aged 77-96 years who are frail.

Indexed as

FrailtyPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesWomen's HealthFrailtyOlder womenOldest oldPotentially inappropriate medications

Identifiers

PMID33449339
OpenAlexW3120286506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.