Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33449282›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2021

Treatment of Patients with Prediabetes in a Primary Care Setting 2011-2018: an Observational Study.

Sidra L Speaker, Radhika Rastogi, Tamara A Sussman, Bo Hu, Anita D Misra-Hebert, Michael B Rothberg

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modern-Day Management of the Dysglycemic Continuum: An Expert Viewpoint from the Arabian Gulf.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sidra L SpeakerCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Radhika RastogiCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Tamara A SussmanTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Bo HuQuantitative Health Services, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Anita D Misra-HebertQuantitative Health Services, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michael B RothbergCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. rothbem@ccf.org.

Funding

Impact of a Team-based Approach to Primary Care: A Natural Experiment in Primary Care RedesignK08HS024128 · AHRQ · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI MISRA-HEBERT, ANITA DIANA · 2016 to 2020
$738k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS024128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver one third of American adults are at high risk for developing diabetes, which can be delayed or prevented using interventions such as medical nutrition therapy (MNT) or metformin. Physicians' self-reported rates of prediabetes treatment are improving, but patterns of actual referral, prescription, and MNT visits are unknown.

objectiveTo characterize treatment of prediabetes in primary care.

designWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data. We described patterns of treatment and used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association of patient factors and PCP-specific treatment rate with patient treatment. PATIENTS: We included overweight or obese outpatients who had a first prediabetes-range hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) during 2011-2018 and had primary care provider (PCP) follow-up within a year. MAIN MEASURES: We collected patient characteristics and the following treatments: metformin prescription; referral to MNT, diabetes education, endocrinology, or bariatric medicine; and MNT visit. We did not capture within-visit physician counseling. KEY

resultsOf 16,713 outpatients with prediabetes, 20.4% received treatment, including metformin prescriptions (7.8%) and MNT referrals (11.3%), but only 7.4% of referred patients completed a MNT visit. The strongest predictor of treatment was the patient's PCP's treatment rate. Some PCPs never treated prediabetes, but two treated more than half of their patients; 62% had no patients complete a MNT visit. Being younger or female and having higher body mass index or HbA1c were also positively associated with treatment. Compared to white patients, black patients were more likely to receive MNT referral and less likely to receive metformin.

conclusionsAlmost 80% of patients with new prediabetes never received treatment, and those who did receive referrals had very poor visit completion. Treatment rates appear to reflect provider rather than patient preferences.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusMetforminPrediabetic StateAdultFemaleHumansPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesMetformin

Identifiers

PMID33449282
PMCPMC8041989

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.