ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2021
Brachial plexus tumors extending into the cervicothoracic spine: a review with operative nuances and outcomes.
Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinical value and application of augmented reality navigation in brachial plexus schwannoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anterior selective scalenectomy for periforaminal exposure in the ventral supraclavicular approach.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rarity and anatomical complexity of brachial plexus tumors (BPTs) impose many challenges onto surgeons performing surgical resections, especially when these tumors invade the cervicothoracic spine. Treatment choices and surgery outcomes heavily depend on anatomical location and tumor type.
methodsThe authors performed an extensive review of the published literature (PubMed) focusing on "brachial plexus tumors" that identified invasion of the cervicothoracic spine.
resultsThe search yielded 2774 articles pertaining to "brachial plexus tumors". Articles not in the English language or involving cervicothoracic spinal invasion were excluded.
conclusionsRecent research has shown that the most common method used to resect tumors of the proximal roots is the dorsal subscapular approach. Despite its association with high morbidity rate, this technique offers excellent exposure to the spinal roots and intraforaminal portion of the spinal nerve. The dorsal approach is used to resect recurrent lower trunk tumors and dumbbell-shaped neurofibromas, yet it is also the least common overall approach used in brachial plexus tumor resections. The ventral or anterior technique is commonly used to resect tumors at the cord to division level, and root to trunk level. Motor complications, transient nerve palsy, and bleeding are among the most common complications of the anterior supraclavicular approach. Further controlled studies are needed to fully determine the optimal surgical approach used to obtain the best outcomes and least complications for each type of brachial plexus tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.