Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33449234›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2021

[Artificial intelligence in cardiology : Relevance, current applications, and future developments].

Bettina Zippel-Schultz, Carsten Schultz, Dirk Müller-Wieland, Andrew B Remppis, Martin Stockburger, Christian Perings, Thomas M Helms

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bettina Zippel-SchultzDeutsche Stiftung für chronisch Kranke, Berlin, Deutschland.
Carsten SchultzLehrstuhl für Technologiemanagement, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland.
Dirk Müller-WielandMedizinische Klinik I - Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
Andrew B RemppisKlinik für Kardiologie, Herz- und Gefässzentrum Bad Bevensen, Bad Bevensen, Deutschland.
Martin StockburgerMedizinische Klinik Nauen, Schwerpunkt Kardiologie, Havelland Kliniken, Nauen, Deutschland.
Christian PeringsMedizinische Klinik 1, St.-Marien-Hospital Lünen, Lünen, Deutschland.
Thomas M HelmsDeutsche Stiftung für chronisch Kranke, Fürth, Deutschland. Thomas_Helms@t-online.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Big data and applications of artificial intelligence (AI), such as machine learning or deep learning, will enrich healthcare in the future and become increasingly important. Among other things, they have the potential to avoid unnecessary examinations as well as diagnostic and therapeutic errors. They could enable improved, early and accelerated decision-making. In the article, the authors provide an overview of current AI-based applications in cardiology. The examples describe innovative solutions for risk assessment, diagnosis and therapy support up to patient self-management. Big data and AI serve as a basis for efficient, predictive, preventive and personalised medicine. However, the examples also show that research is needed to further develop the solutions for the benefit of the patient and the medical profession, to demonstrate the effectiveness and benefits in health care and to establish legal and ethical standards.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCardiologyForecastingHumansMachine LearningRisk AssessmentAcceptanceBig dataDecision-making supportRisk assessmentSelf-management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.