Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33449232›Full record

ArticleHEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues2021

Utilitarian Principlism as a Framework for Crisis Healthcare Ethics.

Laura Vearrier, Carrie M Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Lottery or Triage? Controlled Experimental Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic on Public Preferences for Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Article
  6. Challenging ageism in eCPR: the quiet discrimination.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. COVID 19: A Cause for Pause in Undergraduate Medical Education and Catalyst for Innovation.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura VearrierDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State St., Jackson, MS, 39216, USA. lvearrier@umc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8068-7812
Carrie M HendersonDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State St., Jackson, MS, 39216, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces the model of Utilitarian Principlism as a framework for crisis healthcare ethics. In modern Western medicine, during non-crisis times, principlism provides the four guiding principles in biomedical ethics-autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice; autonomy typically emerges as the decisive principle. The physician-patient relationship is a deontological construct in which the physician's primary duty is to the individual patient and the individual patient is paramount. For this reason, we term the non-crisis ethical framework that guides modern medicine Deontological Principlism. During times of crisis, resources become scarce, standards of care become dynamic, and public health ethics move to the forefront. Healthcare providers are forced to work in non-ideal conditions, and interactions with individual patients must be considered in the context of the crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced healthcare to shift to a more utilitarian framework with a greater focus on promoting the health of communities and populations. This paper puts forth the notion of Utilitarian Principlism as a framework for crisis healthcare ethics. We discuss each of the four principles from a utilitarian perspective and use clinical vignettes, based on real cases from the COVID-19 pandemic, for illustrative purposes. We explore how Deontological Principlism and Utilitarian Principlism are two ends of a spectrum, and the implications to healthcare as we emerge from the pandemic.

Indexed as

BioethicsEthical TheoryPrinciple-Based EthicsBeneficenceCOVID-19HumansMoral ObligationsPandemicsPersonal AutonomyPhysician-Patient RelationsSARS-CoV-2Social JusticeBioethicsCOVID-19PandemicsPopulation healthPrinciplismStandard of care

Identifiers

PMID33449232
PMCPMC7809094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.