ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Patients undergoing multiphase CT scans and receiving a cumulative effective dose of ≥ 100 mSv in a single episode of care.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cumulative radiation doses due to nuclear medicine examinations: a systematic review.The British journal of radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Radiation exposure in recurrent medical imaging: identifying drivers and high-risk populations.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Cumulative Dose from Recurrent CT Scans: Exploring the DNA Damage Response in Human Non-Transformed Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Cumulative radiation exposure from multimodality recurrent imaging of CT, fluoroscopically guided intervention, and nuclear medicine.European radiology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of patient radiation dose and risk of cancer from CT examinations.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Article
- Cumulative radiation exposure from radiological imaging in patients with Hodgkin and diffuse large b-cell lymphoma not submitted to radiotherapy.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Identification and characterization of patients being exposed to computed-tomography associated radiation-doses above 100 mSv in a real-life setting.European journal of radiology open · 2023Article
- Effect of teach-back health education combined with structured psychological nursing on adverse emotion and patient cooperation duringWorld journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Cytogenetic Effects in Patients after Computed Tomography Examination.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Organ doses and cancer risk assessment in patients exposed to high doses from recurrent CT exams.European journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed?The British journal of radiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo estimate the number of patients who receive a cumulative effective dose (CED) of ≥ 100 mSv from computed tomography (CT) in a single day or episode of care.
methodsWe examined 28,870 patients who underwent 49,834 CT examinations in a tertiary care centre in Italy in 2.5 years. Radiation exposures were retrieved from the hospital's automatic exposure monitoring system. Two cohorts were identified as those who received a CED of ≥ 100 mSv in a single day and within a month starting from the first examination. Organ doses were estimated for the first cohort.
resultsAmong the 1765 (6.1%) patients who received CED ≥ 100 mSv in the observation period, 427 received a CED of ≥ 100 mSv within a month (and 70 patients in a single day). This group represented 1.5% of all patients who underwent CT exams and 24% of those who received CED ≥ 100 mSv in the observation period. The clinical indication for referral included cancer in 132 patients (31%) and non-oncological indications in 295 patients (69%). In 68/70 patients with CED > 100 mSv in a single day, at least one organ/tissue received a dose of ≥ 100 mGy.
conclusionsThe finding of a sizeable percentage of patients undergoing CT exams and receiving CED ≥ 100 mSv in a single episode of care points toward the need of imaging appropriateness criteria, to revise the routine protocols, to replace older machines, and to provide to the radiologist the patient's prior radiation history to facilitate an appropriate decision-making process. KEY POINTS: • Patients can receive effective doses greater than 100 mSv in a single CT or in multiple CT examinations performed in a single episode of care in 1.5% of patients in a 2.5-year period. • In this study, the clinical indication for CT referral was non-oncological in 69% of patients. • The patient's prior radiation history should be provided to the referring physicians and the radiological medical practitioner to facilitate an appropriate decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.