Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33449178›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Location of embolization affects patency after coil embolization for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: importance of time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosis of patency.

Masashi Shimohira, Hiro Kiyosue, Keigo Osuga, Hideo Gobara, Hiroshi Kondo, Tetsuro Nakazawa, Yusuke Matsui, Kohei Hamamoto, Tomoya Ishiguro, Miyuki Maruno and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. An Update on Embolization for Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Masashi ShimohiraDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan. mshimohira@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4907-9111
Hiro KiyosueDepartment of Radiology, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
Keigo OsugaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Hideo GobaraDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Hiroshi KondoDepartment of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuro NakazawaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yusuke MatsuiDepartment of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Kohei HamamotoDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Tomoya IshiguroDepartment of Neuro-Intervention, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Miyuki MarunoDepartment of Radiology, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
Koji SugimotoDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Masamichi KoganemaruDepartment of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Akira KitagawaDepartment of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
Koichiro YamakadoDepartment of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Oita University · JPOkayama University · JPAichi Medical University · JPHyogo Medical University · JPJichi Medical University · JPKobe University · JPKurume University · JPNagoya City University · JPOsaka City General Hospital · JPOsaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPTeikyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (TR-MRA) for patency after coil embolization of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) and identify factors affecting patency.

methodsData from the records of 205 patients with 378 untreated PAVMs were retrospectively analyzed. Differences in proportional reduction of the sac or draining vein on CT between occluded and patent PAVMs were examined, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of CT using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the definitive diagnostic modality. The accuracy of TR-MRA was also assessed in comparison to DSA. Potential factors affecting patency, including sex, age, number of PAVMs, location of PAVMs, type of PAVM, and location of embolization, were evaluated.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of CT were 82%, 81%, 77%, 85%, and 82%, respectively, when the reduction rate threshold was set to 55%, which led to the highest diagnostic accuracy. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of TR-MRA were 89%, 95%, 89%, 95%, and 93%, respectively. On both univariable and multivariable analyses, embolization of the distal position to the last normal branch of the pulmonary artery was a factor that significantly affected the prevention of patency.

conclusionsTR-MRA appears to be an appropriate method for follow-up examinations due to its high accuracy for the diagnosis of patency after coil embolization of PAVMs. The location of embolization is a factor affecting patency. KEY POINTS: • Diagnosis of patency after coil embolization for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) is important because a patent PAVM can lead to neurologic complications. • The diagnostic accuracies of CT with a cutoff value of 55% and TR-MRA were 82% and 93%, respectively. • The positioning of the coils relative to the sac and the last normal branch of the artery was significant for preventing PAVM patency.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous MalformationsEmbolization, TherapeuticPulmonary VeinsHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyPulmonary ArteryRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArteriovenous malformationsDiagnosisTherapeutic occlusion

Identifiers

PMID33449178
OpenAlexW3120276373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.