Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33449175›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Identifying response in colorectal liver metastases treated with bevacizumab: development of RECIST by combining contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI.

Li-Heng Liu, Guo-Feng Zhou, Han Lv, Zhen-Chang Wang, Sheng-Xiang Rao, Meng-Su Zeng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li-Heng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Guo-Feng ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
Han LvDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhen-Chang WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Sheng-Xiang RaoDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China. raoxray@163.com.
Meng-Su ZengDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China. mengsu_med@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-7103

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China NO. 81701656Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty NO. W2019-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesResponse evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) often fail to identify clinically meaningful response to bevacizumab-containing therapy in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). This study aimed to develop RECIST by combining contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsA total of 126 patients with CRLM who underwent hepatic resection after bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy were split into initial analyses cohort (N = 42, with 76 indexed liver metastases) and validation cohort (N = 84). In lesion-based analyses, percentage decrease of arterial enhancement area and percentage increase of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value from baseline to post-chemotherapy were measured. Their optimal cutoff values for distinguishing pathology-confirmed major and minor response were determined. Then, the developed RECIST (D-RECIST) was established by combining functional and size-based items. Survival relevance of D-RECIST and RECIST was examined in the validation cohort.

resultsPercentage decrease of arterial enhancement area and increase of ADC value significantly differed between lesions of pathologic major or minor response, with optimal cutoffs of approximately 33% and 19%, respectively. Patients defined as responders by D-RECIST had a significantly longer median disease-free survival (DFS) than non-responders (p = 0.021; 12.9 versus 8.6 months). No significant difference was observed with RECIST (p = 0.524). In a Cox regression model, D-RECIST- but not RECIST-defined responses independently predicted the DFS (p = 0.034 and 0.811).

conclusionsD-RECIST-defined responses provided significant prognostic information, and thus may serve as a better response evaluation approach than RECIST in CRLM treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy. KEY POINTS: • Changes in arterial enhancement area and apparent diffusion coefficient value are associated with pathological response in colorectal liver metastases treated with bevacizumab. • The MRI-based response criteria developed by combining size-based and functional features can provide significant prognostic information.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsBevacizumabDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsTreatment OutcomeBevacizumabBevacizumabColorectal neoplasmsDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingMetastatic liver cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.