Observational studyRheumatology international2022
Performance of diagnostic criteria in pediatric Behçet's disease.
Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of pediatric Vasculo-Behçet's syndrome: a retrospective analysis of 12 cases.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Successful Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Intestinal Behçet's Disease with Ileocecal Ulcer Refractory to Medical Therapy: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- [Clinical characteristics of Behçet syndrome in 45 children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Article
- Clinical heterogeneity and five phenotypes identified in pediatric Behçet's syndrome: a cohort study from Shanghai Behçet's syndrome database.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2024Article
- Pediatric Behçet's disease: Experience of a single tertiary center.Archives of rheumatology · 2023Article
- Pediatric uveitis: Role of the pediatrician.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behçet's disease is an inflammatory vasculitic disease of unknown etiology characterized by recurrent oral and genital ulcers, ocular findings, and multiple organ involvement. Mucocutaneous findings are the most common symptoms. The most used diagnostic criteria are International Criteria for BD (ICBD), International Study Group (ISG) criteria and pediatric Behçet's disease criteria (PEDBD). Although diagnostic criteria have been defined, the diagnosis is still difficult due to clinical findings developed in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical findings, phenotype characteristics, sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic criteria, and the course of pediatric Behçet's disease (BD). We evaluated retrospectively the files of 67 (29 M/38 F) patients diagnosed with BD according to expert opinion. The patients were reclassified according to ISG, ICBD, and PEDBD criteria. The control group consisted of a total of 69 patients with BD-mimicking diseases or presenting at least one major BD sign followed at the same center. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for the criteria. The mean age of diagnosis was 13.38 ± 3.2 years. There were oral aphthous ulcers in 98.5%, genital ulcers in 68.7%, skin lesions in 31.3%, vascular involvement in 17.9%, neurological involvement in 11.9%, positive pathergy test in 33.8%, and positive HLA-B51 in 57.1% of patients. The sensitivity of ICBD, ISG and PEDBD criteria was 88.1, 43.3, and 37.3%, respectively. The specificity of ICBD, ISG, and PEDBD criteria was 100%. Diagnosis of BD in childhood is still difficult. ICBD criteria have the highest sensitivity among the diagnostic criteria. These criteria can also be used in childhood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33449161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.