Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33449156›Full record

SynthesisDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2021

[Evidence of minimally invasive oncological surgery of the liver].

Stefan Heinrich, Hauke Lang

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefan HeinrichKlinik f. Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Hauke LangKlinik f. Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. hauke.lang@unimedizin-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the liver has significantly increased with the increasing number of publications on this topic in recent years; however, this technique has not yet gained broad acceptance among surgeons.

objectiveAnalysis and presentation of the current literature on MIS of the liver. MATERIAL UND

methodsStructured PubMed literature search and analysis.

resultsAccording to the literature, MIS and open liver surgery are equivalent regarding the oncological quality. In addition to parenchyma-preserving resections, major hepatectomies (e.g. hemihepatectomy and sectorectomy), two-stage concepts and re-resections have increasingly been reported. The MIS of the liver is associated with less blood loss and other immunological advantages in addition to a shorter hospital stay. The highest level of evidence has been achieved for colorectal liver metastases for which a systematic review even revealed a survival benefit for patients undergoing MIS surgery. From an oncological perspective, laparoscopic and robotic liver surgery are considered to be equivalent.

conclusionAccording to the current literature MIS of the liver is recommended for the resection of colorectal liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLiver NeoplasmsHepatectomyHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsColorectal liver metastasisHepatocellular carcinomaLaparoscopic liver surgeryMinimally invasive liver surgeryRobotic liver surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.