Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33449131›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

Defining early recurrence in patients with resected primary colorectal carcinoma and its respective risk factors.

Felix Wiesmueller, Rolf Schuetz, Melanie Langheinrich, Maximilian Brunner, Georg F Weber, Robert Grützmann, Susanne Merkel, Christian Krautz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Felix WiesmuellerDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. f.wiesmueller@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-804X
Rolf SchuetzDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Melanie LangheinrichDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Maximilian BrunnerDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Georg F WeberDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Robert GrützmannDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Susanne MerkelDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Christian KrautzDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is no evidence-based definition of early recurrence following resection of colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study is to define a point that discriminates between early and late recurrence in patients who have undergone colorectal cancer resection with curative intent and to analyze associated risk factors.

methodsA retrospective single-center cohort study was performed at a university hospital recognized as a comprehensive cancer center, specializing in colorectal cancer surgery. Patient data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Included patients underwent resection for primary, non-metastatic colorectal carcinomas with curative intent between 1995 and 2010. Aims of the study were (1) to define the optimal cut-off point of recurrence-free survival based on overall survival using a minimum p value approach and (2) to identify patterns of initial recurrence and putative risk factors for early recurrence using regression models.

resultsRecurrence was diagnosed in 412 of 1893 patients. Statistical analysis suggested that a recurrence-free survival of 16 months could be used to distinguish between early and late recurrence based on overall survival (p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for early recurrence included advanced pT categories (pT3,4/ypT3,4) and positive lymph node status (pN+/ypN+). Early recurrence was independent of site of recurrence and was associated with worse prognosis.

conclusionsRecurrence of colorectal carcinoma within 16 months after primary treatment should be labeled as "early." Tumor categories pT3,4/ypT3,4 and positive lymph node status pN+/ypN+ are predictive of early recurrence.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalCohort StudiesHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCancer recurrenceColorectal cancerColorectal carcinomaFollow-upHemicolectomyLow anterior resectionRecurrence group

Identifiers

PMID33449131
PMCPMC8119399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.