ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2021
Flexion Dysfunction of Atlanto-Occipital Joint Associated with Cervical Spondylosis.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Posterior hybrid surgery for atlantoaxial dislocation coexisting with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Cervical Alignment of Patients with Basilar Invagination: A Radiological Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- Logistic Model and Gradient Boosting Machine Model for Physical Therapy of Lumbar Disc Herniation.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical impact of 3-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex: a retrospective study of patients who received a zero-profile anchored spacer versus cage-plate construct.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the association between atlanto-occipital radiographic alignment in flexion and cervical spondylosis (CS).
methodsThis is a retrospective case-control study. CS patients were recruited from our hospital, and the age/gender/body mass index (BMI)-matched healthy controls were selected from the subjects in health examinations at the same hospital between January 2015 and May 2019. A total of 464 subjects was included in the study. There are 282 males and 182 females. The ages of patients were 20 to 67 years, and the mean age was 33.9 years. CS patients were considered the case group. Based on surgical treatments, they were subdivided into non-operation group and operation group. The operation group and non-operation group had 45 and 187 patients, respectively, while 232 subjects were included in the control group. The angle between McGregor's line and C
resultsThe median follow-up time was 51.6 months (25-115 months). The case groups, especially the operation group, tended to be older (55.8 ± 11.2 vs 41.6 ± 13.8 vs 23.5 ± 5.5 years, P < 0.001), have a higher NDI score (12.2 ± 4.5 vs 6.2 ± 2.1 vs 3.2 ± 1.2, P < 0.001), and longer medical history (10.5 ± 9.5 vs 6.8 ± 11.2 years, P < 0.001). One-way analysis of variance showed statistically significant differences in FOC between the control and case groups (1.4° ± 1.2° vs 3.6° ± 1.9° vs 7.2° ± 2.0°, P < 0.001). Besides, a post-hoc Tukey test showed a lower FOC in the operation group compared with that in the non-operation group (1.4° ± 1.2° vs 3.6° ± 1.9°, P < 0.001). Using FOC as a radiological predictive model to predict CS, the cut-off value was 4.2°. Using FOC as a radiological predictive model to predict CS, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.92, P < 0.001). In the univariable risk analysis model, conditional logistic regression showed that the FOC level was an independent factor with an important role in the risk of CS. The odds rose to 8.2 times when FOC reached the level under 4.2° (OR = 8.2; 95% CI: 6.4-10.0; P < 0.001). There existed a significant negative correlation between FOC levels and NDI (r = -0.451, P = 0.016).
conclusionsStiff O-C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.