Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33448328›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of dermatology2021

Interventions for basal cell carcinoma: abridged Cochrane systematic review and GRADE assessments.

J Thomson, S Hogan, J Leonardi-Bee, H C Williams, F J Bath-Hextall

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J ThomsonDepartment of Dermatology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6644-0979
S HoganDepartment of Dermatology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
J Leonardi-BeeCentre for Evidence Based Healthcare, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Clinical Sciences Building Phase 2, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0893-6068
H C WilliamsCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
F J Bath-HextallEmeritus Professor, Evidence Based Health Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T001720/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBasal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer affecting white-skinned individuals, and the worldwide incidence is increasing. Although rarely fatal, BCC is associated with significant morbidity and costs.

objectivesTo assess the effects of interventions for primary BCC in immunocompetent adults.

methodsWe updated our searches of the following databases to November 2019: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and LILACS. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

resultsWe included 52 randomized controlled trials with 6990 participants (median age 65 years; range 20-95). Mean study duration was 13 months (range 6 weeks-10 years). Ninety-two per cent (n = 48/52) of studies exclusively included histologically low-risk BCC (nodular and superficial subtypes). The certainty of evidence was predominantly low or moderate for the outcomes of interest. Overall, surgical interventions have the lowest recurrence rates, and there may be slightly fewer recurrences with Mohs micrographic surgery over surgical excision for primary, facial BCC (high-risk histological subtype or located in the 'H-zone' or both) (low-certainty evidence). Nonsurgical treatments, when used for low-risk BCC, are less effective than surgical treatments, but recurrence rates are acceptable and cosmetic outcomes are probably superior.

conclusionsSurgical interventions have lower recurrence rates and remain the gold standard for high-risk BCC. Of the nonsurgical treatments, topical imiquimod has the best evidence to support its efficacy for low-risk BCC. Priorities for future research include agreement on core outcome measures and studies with longer follow-up.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansImiquimodMiddle AgedMohs SurgeryNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalYoung AdultImiquimod

Identifiers

PMID33448328
OpenAlexW3124767582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.