Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33448327›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2022

Two-stage penalized regression screening to detect biomarker-treatment interactions in randomized clinical trials.

Jixiong Wang, Ashish Patel, James M S Wason, Paul J Newcombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A General Framework for Identifying Hierarchical Interactions and Its Application to Genomics Data.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jixiong WangMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ashish PatelMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
James M S WasonMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4691-126X
Paul J NewcombeMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5611-6702

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_UU_00002/6Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/9Medical Research Council MR/R502303/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dimensional biomarkers such as genomics are increasingly being measured in randomized clinical trials. Consequently, there is a growing interest in developing methods that improve the power to detect biomarker-treatment interactions. We adapt recently proposed two-stage interaction detecting procedures in the setting of randomized clinical trials. We also propose a new stage 1 multivariate screening strategy using ridge regression to account for correlations among biomarkers. For this multivariate screening, we prove the asymptotic between-stage independence, required for familywise error rate control, under biomarker-treatment independence. Simulation results show that in various scenarios, the ridge regression screening procedure can provide substantially greater power than the traditional one-biomarker-at-a-time screening procedure in highly correlated data. We also exemplify our approach in two real clinical trial data applications.

Indexed as

GenomicsBiomarkersComputer SimulationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersbiomarkerclinical trialinteractionrandomizationridge regressionscreening

Identifiers

PMID33448327
PMCPMC7613856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.