Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33448239›Full record

ArticleRNA biology2021

Differential transcription profiling of the phage LUZ19 infection process in different growth media.

Ana Brandão, Diana P Pires, Lucas Coppens, Marleen Voet, Rob Lavigne, Joana Azeredo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of the use of bacteriophages for in vitro biofilm control.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Depletion of mMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Obtaining Detailed Phage Transcriptomes Using ONT-Cappable-Seq.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Impact of phage predation onRNA biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Development of ONT-cappable-seq to unravel the transcriptional landscape ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana BrandãoCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Diana P PiresCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Lucas CoppensLaboratory of Gene Technology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marleen VoetLaboratory of Gene Technology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rob LavigneLaboratory of Gene Technology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7377-1314
Joana AzeredoCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5180-7133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA sequencing of phage-infected bacterial cultures offers a snapshot of transcriptional events occurring during the infection process, providing insights into the phage transcriptional organization as well as the bacterial response. To better mimic real environmental contexts, we performed RNA-seq of

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsTranscriptomeBacterial ProteinsBacteriophagesCell Culture TechniquesCulture MediaGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHumansPseudomonas aeruginosaBacterial ProteinsCulture MediaBacteriophagegene expressionP. aeruginosaRNA-seqtranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID33448239
PMCPMC8583145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.