Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447910›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2021

Cell Sources for Human In vitro Bone Models.

Sana Ansari, Keita Ito, Sandra Hofmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Evaluation ofPeerJ · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. 3DACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Revolutionizing bone healing: the role of 3D models.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. 3D Bioprinting in Otolaryngology: A Review.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. High Bone Mass Disorders: New Insights From Connecting the Clinic and the Bench.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sana AnsariOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Keita ItoOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Sandra HofmannOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. S.Hofmann@tue.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2568-8388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewOne aim in bone tissue engineering is to develop human cell-based, 3D in vitro bone models to study bone physiology and pathology. Due to the heterogeneity of cells among patients, patient's own cells are needed to be obtained, ideally, from one single cell source. This review attempts to identify the appropriate cell sources for development of such models. RECENT

findingsBone marrow and peripheral blood are considered as suitable sources for extraction of osteoblast/osteocyte and osteoclast progenitor cells. Recent studies on these cell sources have shown no significant differences between isolated progenitor cells. However, various parameters such as medium composition affect the cell's proliferation and differentiation potential which could make the peripheral blood-derived stem cells superior to the ones from bone marrow. Peripheral blood can be considered a suitable source for osteoblast/osteocyte and osteoclast progenitor cells, being less invasive for the patient. However, more investigations are needed focusing on extraction and differentiation of both cell types from the same donor sample of peripheral blood.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedHumansIn Vitro TechniquesOsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteocytesOsteogenesisStem CellsTissue EngineeringBone marrowHematopoietic stem cellIn vitro bone modelMesenchymal stem cellPeripheral bloodPersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID33447910
PMCPMC7935740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.