Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447892›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2021

Body mass index as an independent prognostic factor in glioblastoma.

Pedro Valente Aguiar, Bruno Carvalho, Rui Vaz, Paulo Linhares

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Baseline single institutional retrospective review of body mass index (BMI) as a prognostic indicator in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pedro Valente AguiarNeurosurgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal. pedrovalenteaguiar@protonmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4279-3315
Bruno CarvalhoNeurosurgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
Rui VazNeurosurgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
Paulo LinharesNeurosurgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlioblastoma prognosis remains dismal despite gross total removal (GTR) followed by chemoradiotherapy. Other known prognostic factors include functional status, age and IDH mutation status. However, to improve patient outcome, a search for other features with impact on survival is needed. We aimed to analyse the impact of body mass index (BMI) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of surgically resected primary glioblastoma and evaluate if BMI constitutes an independent prognostic factor.

methodsWe analysed all adult glioblastoma patients who underwent surgery and chemoradiotherapy between 2011 and 2017 at our institution. Overall survival was the study-primary endpoint, and progression-free survival-the secondary endpoint. We assayed age, gender, histology, extent of resection, IDH, functional and smoking status, cardiovascular risk factors, BMI, OS and PFS. Univariate analysis was conducted followed by multivariate analysis to establish independent prognostic factors. In accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) BMI stratification, survival curves were obtained for normal-weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m

results193 patients were evaluated, with a median follow-up time of 17.3 months. Median OS was 21.3 months in obese patients vs 16.2 months in the non-obese (p = 0.017) and 16 months in the normal weight (p = 0.007). Higher median OS was also observed in patients under 60 and those in which GTR was obtained. Median PFS in obese individuals was 9 months in comparison to 6 months in the normal-weight subgroup (p = 0.04) and 7 months in the non-obese (p = 0.050). Multivariate analysis identified age < 60 (p = 0.044), GTR (p = 0.004) and BMI ≥ 30 (p = 0.009) as independent prognostic factors for increased overall survival.

conclusionHigher BMI was associated with longer OS and PFS. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisBody mass indexGlioblastomaObeseOverall survivalProgression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID33447892
OpenAlexW3120701913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.