Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447876›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2020

Dispersal and Land Cover Contribute to Pseudorabies Virus Exposure in Invasive Wild Pigs.

Felipe A Hernández, Amanda N Carr, Michael P Milleson, Hunter R Merrill, Michael L Avery, Brandon M Parker, Cortney L Pylant, James D Austin, Samantha M Wisely

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Felipe A HernándezSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Amanda N CarrDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Michael P MillesonUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, Gainesville, FL, 32641, USA.
Hunter R MerrillDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Michael L AveryUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Gainesville, FL, 32641, USA.
Brandon M ParkerDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Cortney L PylantDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
James D AustinDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0643-8620
Samantha M WiselyDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. wisely@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1748-4518
University of Florida · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USAustral University of Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the landscape epidemiology of a globally distributed mammal, the wild pig (Sus scrofa), in Florida (U.S.), where it is considered an invasive species and reservoir to pathogens that impact the health of people, domestic animals, and wildlife. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that two commonly cited factors in disease transmission, connectivity among populations and abundant resources, would increase the likelihood of exposure to both pseudorabies virus (PrV) and Brucella spp. (bacterial agent of brucellosis) in wild pigs across the Kissimmee Valley of Florida. Using DNA from 348 wild pigs and sera from 320 individuals at 24 sites, we employed population genetic techniques to infer individual dispersal, and an Akaike information criterion framework to compare candidate logistic regression models that incorporated both dispersal and land cover composition. Our findings suggested that recent dispersal conferred higher odds of exposure to PrV, but not Brucella spp., among wild pigs throughout the Kissimmee Valley region. Odds of exposure also increased in association with agriculture and open canopy pine, prairie, and scrub habitats, likely because of highly localized resources within those land cover types. Because the effect of open canopy on PrV exposure reversed when agricultural cover was available, we suggest that small-scale resource distribution may be more important than overall resource abundance. Our results underscore the importance of studying and managing disease dynamics through multiple processes and spatial scales, particularly for non-native pathogens that threaten wildlife conservation, economy, and public health.

Indexed as

BrucellaHerpesvirus 1, SuidPseudorabiesSwine DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildSus scrofaSwineDispersalFloridaLandscape compositionPathogen exposurePrVSus scrofaUSAWild pigs

Identifiers

PMID33447876
PMCPMC8192353
OpenAlexW3120583227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.