ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Preoperative classification of primary and metastatic liver cancer via machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of radiomics models for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting intrahepatic recurrence of colorectal cancer liver metastases after curative hepatectomy using a machine learning model with data integration of ultrasound radiomics and clinicopathological parameters.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Radiomics analysis of parotid gland tumors using DWI and DCE-MRI: comparison of multiple machine learning models for differential diagnosis.Polish journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence applications for liver ultrasound imaging.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics in Primary Liver Cancer Imaging: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Construction and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Radiomics and Clinical Features for Discerning Malignant Soft Tissue TumorsCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine Learning-Based Radiopatho-Clinical Model Integrating Ultrasound Radiomics and Kleiner Score for Prognosis Prediction in NAFLD-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics for prediction of 6-month local thermal ablation response in benign thyroid nodules: a multicenter study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Predicting PIK3CA mutation in breast cancer with machine learning based multimodal image radiomics.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Development of a preoperative predictive classifier and tailored staging system for obstructive colorectal cancer.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Multi-algorithm radiomics machine learning models integrating ultrasound imaging and inflammation-immune features for hepatic metastases identification.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Using Machine Learning to Predict the Prognosis in Endometrial Cancer Patients Undergoing Fertility-Sparing Treatment.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing ultrasonographic detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with artificial intelligence: current applications, challenges and future directions.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Development and validation of an ultrasound-based interpretable machine learning model for the classification of ≤3 cm hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective diagnostic study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-based radiogenomics: status, applications, and future direction.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Liver biopsy in the modern era: from traditional techniques to artificial intelligence and multi-omics integration.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in imaging for liver disease diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- MRI-based radiomics machine learning model to differentiate non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma from benign renal tumors.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the application of machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics in preoperative classification of primary and metastatic liver cancer.
methodsData of 114 consecutive histopathologically confirmed patients with liver cancer from January 2018 to November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent liver ultrasonography within 1 week before hepatectomy or fine-needle biopsy. The liver lesions were manually segmented by two experts using ITK-SNAP software. Seven categories of radiomics features, including first-order, two-dimensional shape, gray-level co-occurrence matrices, gray-level run-length matrix, gray-level size-zone matrix, neighboring gray tone difference matrix, and gray-level dependence matrix, were extracted on the Pyradiomics platform. Fourteen filters were applied to the original images, and derived images were obtained. Then, the dimensions of radiomics features were reduced by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) method. Finally, k-nearest neighbor (KNN), logistic regression (LR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) were employed to distinguish primary liver cancer from metastatic liver cancer by a fivefold cross-validation strategy. The performance of the established model was mainly evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and accuracy.
resultsOne thousand four hundred nine radiomics features were extracted from the original images and/or derived images for each patient. The mentioned five machine learning classifiers were able to differentiate primary liver cancer from metastatic liver cancer. LR outperformed other classifiers, with the accuracy of 0.843 ± 0.078 (AUC, 0.816 ± 0.088; sensitivity, 0.768 ± 0.232; specificity, 0.880 ± 0.117).
conclusionsMachine learning-based ultrasound radiomics features are able to non-invasively distinguish primary liver tumors from metastatic liver tumors. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound-based radiomics was initially used for preoperative classification of primary versus metastatic liver cancer. • Multiple machine learning-based algorithms with cross-validation strategy were applied to extract machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics features. • Distinction between primary and metastatic tumors was obtained with a sensitivity of 0.768 and a specificity of 0.880.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33447862What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.