Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447841›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

Boost in Test-Retest Reliability in Resting State fMRI with Predictive Modeling.

Aman Taxali, Mike Angstadt, Saige Rutherford, Chandra Sripada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhancing task fMRI individual difference research with neural signatures.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Opportunities for use of neuroimaging in de-risking drug development and improving clinical outcomes in psychiatry: an industry perspective.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  17. Connectome-based fingerprinting: reproducibility, precision, and behavioral prediction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Connectome predictive modeling of trait mindfulness.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aman TaxaliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Mike AngstadtDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Saige RutherfordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Chandra SripadaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Funding

ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041106 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mary M Heitzeg, Chandra Sekhar Sripada · 2015 to 2026
$24.9M
Impulsivity as Immaturity: Mapping Dysmaturation of the Brain's Control Architecture in Youth Externalizing PsychopathologyR01MH107741 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SRIPADA, CHANDRA SEKHAR · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041106NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies found low test-retest reliability in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), raising serious concerns among researchers, but these studies mostly focused on the reliability of individual fMRI features (e.g., individual connections in resting state connectivity maps). Meanwhile, neuroimaging researchers increasingly employ multivariate predictive models that aggregate information across a large number of features to predict outcomes of interest, but the test-retest reliability of predicted outcomes of these models has not previously been systematically studied. Here we apply 10 predictive modeling methods to resting state connectivity maps from the Human Connectome Project dataset to predict 61 outcome variables. Compared with mean reliability of individual resting state connections, we find mean reliability of the predicted outcomes of predictive models is substantially higher for all 10 modeling methods assessed. Moreover, improvement was consistently observed across all scanning and processing choices (i.e., scan lengths, censoring thresholds, volume- vs. surface-based processing). For the most reliable methods, the reliability of predicted outcomes was mostly, though not exclusively, in the "good" range (above 0.60). Finally, we identified three mechanisms that help to explain why predicted outcomes of predictive models have higher reliability than individual imaging features. We conclude that researchers can potentially achieve higher test-retest reliability by making greater use of predictive models.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalRestBrainConnectomeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetReproducibility of ResultsconnectomicsHuman Connectome Projectpredictive modelingresting state fMRItest–retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID33447841
PMCPMC8599720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.