ArticleBiofilm2020
Monitoring of bacterial community structure and growth: An alternative tool for biofilm microanalysis.
Article in Biofilm, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of heat-treated and untreated vermicompost as a peat substitute in seedling growing media for lettuce seedling growth and microbial properties.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Persistent Threats: A Comprehensive Review of Biofilm Formation, Control, and Economic Implications in Food Processing Environments.Microorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microorganisms, such as bacteria, tend to aggregate and grow on surfaces, secreting extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), forming biofilms. Biofilm formation is a life strategy, because through it microorganisms can create their own microhabitats. Whether for remediation of pollutants or application in the biomedical field, several methodological approaches are necessary for a more accurate analysis of the role and potential use of bacterial biofilms. The use of computerized microtomography to monitor biofilm growth appears to be an advantageous tool due to its non-destructive character and its ability to render 2D and 3D visualization of the samples. In this study, we used several techniques such as analysis of microbiological parameters and biopolymer concentrations to corroborate porosity quantified by 2D and 3D imaging. Quantification of the porosity of samples by microtomography was verified by increased enzymatic activity and, consequently, higher EPS biopolymer synthesis to form biofilm, indicating growth of the biofilm over 96 h. Our interdisciplinary approach provides a better understanding of biofilm growth, enabling integrated use of these techniques as an important tool in bioremediation studies of environments impacted by pollutants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.