ArticleBiofilm2020
Surface functionalization-dependent localization and affinity of SiO
Article in Biofilm, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Understanding bacterial biofilms: From definition to treatment strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Pooled it
- Extracellular polymeric substances in indigenous microalgal-bacterial consortia: advances in characterization techniques and emerging applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Effects of nanoparticles on anaerobic, anammox, aerobic, and algal-bacterial granular sludge: A comprehensive review.Biofilm · 2024Review
- How Nanoparticles Help in Combating Chronic Wound Biofilms Infection?International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- Polyethylenimine-grafted mesoporous silica nanocarriers markedly enhance the bactericidal effect of curcumin against Staphylococcus aureus biofilm.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022Article
- Advancements in antimicrobial nanoscale materials and self-assembling systems.Chemical Society reviews · 2022Review
- Nanotechnology in combating biofilm: A smart and promising therapeutic strategy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- N-Acetyl-Cysteine Increases Activity of Peanut-Shaped Gold Nanoparticles Against Biofilms Formed by Clinical Strains ofInfection and drug resistance · 2022Article
- Synthesis and self-assembly of curcumin-modified amphiphilic polymeric micelles with antibacterial activity.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Article
- Nanomaterials for Treating Bacterial Biofilms on Implantable Medical Devices.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The contribution of the biofilm extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix to reduced antimicrobial susceptibility in biofilms is widely recognised. As such, the direct targeting of the EPS matrix is a promising biofilm control strategy that allows for the disruption of the matrix, thereby allowing a subsequent increase in susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. To this end, surface-functionalized nanoparticles (NPs) have received considerable attention. However, the fundamental understanding of the interactions occurring between engineered NPs and the biofilm EPS matrix has not yet been fully elucidated. An insight into the underlying mechanisms involved when a NP interacts with the EPS matrix will aid in the design of more efficient NPs for biofilm control. Here we demonstrate the use of highly specific fluorescent probes in confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to illustrate the distribution of EPS macromolecules within the biofilm. Thereafter, a three-dimensional (3D) colocalization analysis was used to assess the affinity of differently functionalized silica NPs (SiNPs) and EPS macromolecules from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.