ReviewBiofilm2020
Potential biofilm control strategies for extended spaceflight missions.
Review in Biofilm, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of polyampholyte thin film hydrogels for the prevention ofRSC advances · 2026Article
- Development of a high-resolution multiplex qPCR method to profile microbial consortia in spaceflight water recovery systems.Biofilm · 2026Article
- Longitudinal analysis of stowaway microorganisms aboard modules and cargo spacecraft of the Chinese Space Station.Microbiome · 2026Article
- High extracellular polymeric substance production and biofilm-forming capacity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Microfluidics unveils role of gravity and shear stress on Pseudomonas fluorescens motility and biofilm growth.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- A Review of Recent Progress in Synthetic Polymer Surface Coatings for the Prevention of Biofilm Formation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An early microbial landscape: inspiring endeavor from the China Space Station Habitation Area Microbiome Program (CHAMP).Science China. Life sciences · 2025Article
- Payload Design and Evaluation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Microbiology of human spaceflight: microbial responses to mechanical forces that impact health and habitat sustainability.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024Review
- Space biofilms - An overview of the morphology ofBiofilm · 2024Article
- Biofilm reactors for the treatment of used water in space:potential, challenges, and future perspectives.Biofilm · 2023Article
- Biofilm and human spaceflight.Biofilm · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in spaceflight is minimized on lubricant impregnated surfaces.NPJ microgravity · 2023Article
- Article
- Genome Sequences of Bacteria Isolated from the International Space Station Water Systems.Microbiology resource announcements · 2023Article
- Microbial applications for sustainable space exploration beyond low Earth orbit.NPJ microgravity · 2023Review
- Morphology ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofilms, surface-adherent microbial communities, are associated with microbial fouling and corrosion in terrestrial water-distribution systems. Biofilms are also present in human spaceflight, particularly in the Water Recovery System (WRS) on the International Space Station (ISS). The WRS is comprised of the Urine Processor Assembly (UPA) and the Water Processor Assembly (WPA) which together recycles wastewater from human urine and recovered humidity from the ISS atmosphere. These wastewaters and various process streams are continually inoculated with microorganisms primarily arising from the space crew microbiome. Biofilm-related fouling has been encountered and addressed in spacecraft in low Earth orbit, including ISS and the Russian Mir Space Station. However, planned future missions beyond low Earth orbit to the Moon and Mars present additional challenges, as resupplying spare parts or support materials would be impractical and the mission timeline would be in the order of years in the case of a mission to Mars. In addition, future missions are expected to include a period of dormancy in which the WRS would be unused for an extended duration. The concepts developed in this review arose from a workshop including NASA personnel and representatives with biofilm expertise from a wide range of industrial and academic backgrounds. Here, we address current strategies that are employed on Earth for biofilm control, including antifouling coatings and biocides and mechanisms for mitigating biofilm growth and damage. These ideas are presented in the context of their applicability to spaceflight and identify proposed new topics of biofilm control that need to be addressed in order to facilitate future extended, crewed, spaceflight missions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.