Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447803›Full record

ReviewBiofilm2020

Biofilm mechanics: Implications in infection and survival.

Erin S Gloag, Stefania Fabbri, Daniel J Wozniak, Paul Stoodley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biofilm, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diversification of biofilm architecture among freshwaterApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The EPS-I exopolysaccharide transformsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Biofilms: from the cradle of life to life support.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mechanical Comparison ofACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Article
  17. Dissecting the physics of bacterial biofilms with agent-based simulations.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Biofilm · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erin S GloagDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Stefania FabbriPerfectus Biomed, SciTech Daresbury, Cheshire, WA4 4AB, UK.
Daniel J WozniakDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Paul StoodleyDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.

Funding

The pel exopolysaccharide gene cluster of Pseudomonas aeruginosaR01AI077628 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MATTHEW R. PARSEK, Daniel J Wozniak · 2009 to 2026
$7.1M
The role of Staphylococcus aureus aggregate formation in establishing biofilms in chronic orthopaedic periprosthetic joint infection.R01GM124436 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STOODLEY, PAUL · 2018 to 2021
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077628NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been recognized that biofilms are viscoelastic materials, however the importance of this attribute to the survival and persistence of these microbial communities is yet to be fully realized. Here we review work, which focuses on understanding biofilm mechanics and put this knowledge in the context of biofilm survival, particularly for biofilm-associated infections. We note that biofilm viscoelasticity may be an evolved property of these communities, and that the production of multiple extracellular polymeric slime components may be a way to ensure the development of biofilms with complex viscoelastic properties. We discuss viscoelasticity facilitating biofilm survival in the context of promoting the formation of larger and stronger biofilms when exposed to shear forces, promoting fluid-like behavior of the biofilm and subsequent biofilm expansion by viscous flow, and enabling resistance to both mechanical and chemical methods of clearance. We conclude that biofilm viscoelasticity contributes to the virulence of chronic biofilm infections.

Indexed as

BiofilmBiophysicsExtracellular matrixExtracellular polymeric substanceMechanicsPersistenceToleranceViscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID33447803
PMCPMC7798440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.