Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447752›Full record

ReviewInternational Journal of Cardiology. Hypertension2019

New data, new studies, new hopes for renal denervation in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Vasilios Papademetriou, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Kostas Imprialos, Michael Doumas, Roland E Schmieder, Atul Pathak, Costas Tsioufis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International Journal of Cardiology. Hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vasilios PapademetriouGeorgetown University and VA Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Konstantinos StavropoulosGeorgetown University and VA Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Kostas ImprialosGeorgetown University and VA Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Michael DoumasAristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Roland E SchmiederUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen/Nuremberg, Germany.
Atul PathakClinique Pasteur, Hypertension, Risk Factors and Heart Failure Unit, INSERM 1048, Clinical Research Center, Toulouse, France.
Costas TsioufisNational and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundfollowing the publication of SYMPLICITY HTN-3 the field of renal of denervation was put on hold. Although SYMPLICITY HTN-3 was well-designed and sham-controlled trial it failed to show any meaningful reduction in office or 24 h ambulatory blood pressure. The procedure was however safe and allowed research to continue. Although several pitfalls of the study have been pointed out, incomplete renal denervation was also implicated. Since then, a great deal of basic and clinical research took place and will be briefly commented on in this article. METHODS AND

resultsBefore and after SYMPLICITY-HTN-3, numerous uncontrolled, single or unblinded studies have shown substantial office BP reduction ranging from -7.7 to -32 mmHg and ambulatory BP ranging from -2.2 to 10.2 mmHg. Average weighted office systolic BP reduction was -20.8 mmHg and weighted average 24 h ambulatory BPM reduction was -7.8 mmHg. National and international registries have shown similar BP reductions, but results remained unconvincing due to lack of reliable sham controls. In recent years, 5 well-designed sham - controlled studies (beyond, SYMPLICITY-HTN-3) have been published. Of those studies two were single center and three were multicenter international studies. Four studies used single tip or multi-electrode, radiofrequency catheters and one used focused ultrasound. The three multicenter studies reported positive-placebo subtracted results and established BP reductions measured both in the office and by ambulatory monitoring. No serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsIt can therefore be concluded that the latest sham controlled studies established efficacy and safety of renal denervation.

Indexed as

DenervationHypertensionRenal arterySympathetic nervous system

Identifiers

PMID33447752
PMCPMC7803019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.